overcome nature through practice, learning, dedication, and motivation
Entity vs. Incremental theory
Entity theory, also known as trait theory, or the great man theory of leadership, argues that leadership is a trait, or set of abilities that one is either born with, or not
by definition don't see leadership as a teachable, learnable skill.
Incremental theory argues that leadership is not a trait, but rather, an acquired skill, and is highly influenced by the environment.
more self-efficacy, a belief in their own ability to learn.
people who held incremental theories were more confident, less anxious, and less depressed than those with entity theories of leadership.
Leadership skills of CEOs are not predictive of which companies succeed.
Head of table effect - anyone siting at head of table perceived as leader
Fewest chair effect - Sitting on side with fewer chair perceived as leader
The people who were told that the task was an opportunity to develop and cultivate their skills, learned more, looked directly at their mistakes, used feedback, altered their strategies, and enjoyed the task more than those who were told that the task assessed their underlying abilities.
The reason why some people were able to excel, is because they adopted a Growth Mindset, a belief in their own ability to learn and respond in the face of challenge.
Fixed vs Growth Mindset
People who have a fixed mindset believe that intelligence, personality, talents, and skills are largely carved in stone and unchangeable.
people who have a growth mindset don't see intelligence, personality, talent, and skills as fixed or stable.
More resilientand bounce back from difficult situation
More happier
Less Depressed
More persistent in face of adversary
Knowing how to fail
Describe challenges as test and opportunity to learn
Perform, fail and learn without failing apart
Post traumatic growth theory
Exposure to early failure
Integrate new information for betterment
Leadership style
Theory X vs Theory Y
Thory X - Transactional
People are not intrinsically motivated
Need extrinsic motivation
Incentives - reward for good work
Punishments - bad work or lack of word
People need to be monitored
Theory Y - transformational
People want to contribute
Self motivated to perform good work
Inspire people to excel and contribute
Provide autonomy
Everyone contributes to create value
Task vs. People
Task focused
Agency
Getting work done
Meet performance objectives
Being productive
People focused
Care about people
Welfare
Build trusting relationship
Blake and Mouton leadership grid
Authority obœdience manager
High task, low people
Focus on task
People feel unappreciated
Country Club manager
Low task, high people
No work is getting done
Impoverished leader
Low task, low people
doing nothing
Team leaders
High Task, High People
Work done
care for people
Middle of raod managers
Mid task, Mid people
Should attend to task and people
Failing short on both
Situational leadership model
Hershey and Blanchard realized that because organizations and companies face different challenges and situations change, leaders need to be ready to respond, pivot and adjust.t
Consider readiness of team regarding task
Directing
Low readiness
Delegating
High readiness
Supporting and coaching
Medium readiness
Summary
Understand leadership style and recognise in others
Know strengths and weaknesses
Match style with goals, teams and context
Develop suitable leadership style
Identify the support system
Motivation, emotion and cognition
Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation
Satisfaction with work accounts for much of our satisfaction with life and affects our health and stress.
Double standard
People beleive that they are inteinsicly motivated
Others are extrinsicly motivated
Result in falsly using extinsic motivation
Intrinsic Motivation - Desire driven by internal rewards
Sense of satisfaction
Accomplishments
Making world a better place
Extrinsic motivation - Desire driven by promise of external rewards
Money
Resources
Power
Material gain
Affirm intrinsic motivation in self and others
Results in greater insights and performance
Intrinsic motivation is sustainable
The how of happiness
Philanthropy > pleasure
Happiness is achieved by cultivating activities
Split of happiness
50% genetically determined
10% life circumstances (material wealth, marriage, employment status, income, possions
Hedonic treadmill
Short lived
40% intentional activity
Behaviors and practices voluntarily pursues
Helping others
Adopting positive attitude
Exercise
Striving for goals
Happy people
Less likely to get sick
less likely to suffer from diabetese
Better organisational citizen
Better social relationship
Unhappy people
Absent from work more often
CHange jobs more often
Negatively affect customers and clients
leaders with positive moods were particularly contagious and effected the positivity of others and their groups
Treat happiness like your routine exercise
Commit to it
Work on it
Decision making
Bias
Egocentric Bias
The unwarranted belief in one's own decision prowess.
Overconfidence
Risk
Risk averse when good things
Risk seeking when negative things
Framing effect
Frame question to reflect negative thing
Manipulate people based on risk
Confirmation bias
the tendency for people to seek information that confirms what they want to believe
Example financial crisis at lehman brothers
Team scaling falacy
As team size increases, people increasingly underestimate the number of labor hours required to complete the project.
The common information effect is the tendency for groups to discuss information that they all have in common, rather than unique information.
teams had a bias toward discussing information, clues, and assumptions they had in common.
Remedy
suspend initial judgment, consider the alternatives one at a time, and find out who has information that is not shared by all group members
Decision fatigue
the very act of making decisions produces fatigue
leaders are often unaware that they are mentally fatigued and they become organizationally dangerous.
Techniques to overcome biases
This means they get out their calendars at the beginning of the week, and figure out what meetings, what decisions, what judgement calls, need to be made, and they get ready for those moments.
Summary
Build test of disconfirmation
What could prove you wrong?
Reward team members for providing controversial ideas
Establish policies in advance of obtaining outcomes
Bring in outsiders
Dont tell them prefered course of action
Turn off mail box before making big decisions
Subtopic 4
People Skills
Emotional intelligence
Leaders are judged, not just by how smart they are, but how they handle themselves and others
4 skills
Self awareness
understanding ourselves and seeing ourselves as others see us. People who are high in self-awareness recognize the emotions they experience,
Empathy
Other awareness
Self management
ow to appropriately regulate our emotions, particularly negative ones.
Handle adult tantrum
Amygdala hijack
Key survival skill in information age
successful leaders have self implemented their own way to deal with frustration, anger, etc., before it becomes an ill-fated, career defining move.
Relationship management
Summary
Starts with self awareness
Self awareness lead to empathy
Improve ability to self regulate with rehearsal and practice
Organisational intelligence
Jim McNerney, CEO of Boeing, states that the biggest jump into the CEO job is learning to manage what you can't control having been trained to manage what you can control.
Human capital
sum total of your skills, talents, and abilities, based upon your education and experience.
Organisational capital
the value you bring to your organization in terms of the relationships you build and maintain in and outside of the organization
Information flow
informal systems of connections and relationships developed over time, guide the flow of information.
Boundary spanners
people who span organizational divides and integrate knowledge and best practices around the organization are known as boundary-spanners
the gaps in organizations are structural holes, and unless people are filling them, knowledge is literally falling through the cracks, and we have silos in the organization
the structural holes that exist between people, functional units, and teams represent opportunities for leaders.
with larger networks of otherwise disconnected contacts get promoted earlier than comparable managers with smaller networks of interconnected contacts
Summary
Anayse organisation network
Who are your trusted advisor?
Who are your boundry spanners
Where are the structural holes in organisation
How can you act as bridge between people and groups that should be connected
Cultural intelligence
Culture is the personality of a group
a persons capability to adapt effectively to new cultural contexts.
A stereotype is a faulty belief that everyone from a given group or given culture is the same
a prototype acknowledges that there may be a norm in a given culture, but there is variation and dispersion around that norm
When we meet someone from a different culture, we see their appearance and behaviors. We don't see their values, beliefs, and norms
We infer values, beliefs and norms from behaviours
you are not ready for global assignment until you understand the other person's worldview.
Culture types
Face
primarily East Asia
derive their self worth from earning the respect of others
people should be humble to maintain good relationships, and, it is important to never criticize others, particularly superiors in public.
confrontation style, face cultures are indirect and will usually refer to superiors.
regard to power and status, people in face cultures are often embedded in stable, hierarchical relationships.
Honor
primarily in the Middle East, South Asia, North Africa, and Latin America
Self-worth in honor cultures is socially claimed
confrontation style of honor cultures is to express emotion, and if necessary, take matters into your own hands.
people need to defend their family, and, it is important not to let others insult your reputation
Dignity
primarily Europe North America, Australia, and New Zealand,
own self worth is self determined
very comfortable engaging in direct, rational, fact-based conversation
Status and titles are not nearly as important for people in dignity cultures, as information and talent.
realize that your own cultural beliefs may not be embraced by others
Decide how much you are willing to change when communicating globally
Life story exercise
Page 1
Page 2
Exploratory Activities
Suggested Readings
1. Mindset Survey
To access the Mindset Survey and to learn more about your mindset, visit the website associated with the book Mindset by Carol Dweck, available here: http://mindsetonline.com/testyourmindset/step1.php
2. Post Traumatic Growth Inventory Survey
Access the survey (via email) from the Posttraumatic Growth Research Group at the University of North Carolina – Charlotte, available here: https://ptgi.uncc.edu/ptgi-related-inventories/
To learn more about Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, read this post by Ron Breazeale, Ph.D. from Psychology Today, available here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-the-face-adversity/201111/post-traumatic-growth-inventory
3. Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Scale
To learn more about this scale, please refer to chapter 8 in Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior, (5 ed.) Eglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Randy Pausch’s Last Lecture: Achieving Your Childhood Dreams
Posted by Carnegie Mellon, Randy Pausch's last lecture about achieving your dreams is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji5_MqicxSo
5. General Happiness Scales
Learn more about Dr. Fordyce and his General Happiness Scales by visiting his Happiness Research Website, available here: https://web.archive.org/web/20070113073753/http://www.gethappy.net/
6. Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation Scale
Access “On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS)” by Guay, Vallerand, and Blanchard (this is free for Northwestern University students), available here: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1005614228250
7. Johari Window
To learn more about the Johari Window and to explore and better understand your relationship with yourself and others, refer to Luft, Joseph (1969). Of Human Interaction. Palo Alto, California.
8. Peter Salovey
Visit the Emotional Intelligence Consortium website to access Peter Salovey’s emotional intelligence measures, available here: http://www.eiconsortium.org/measures/measures.html
9. Emotional Intelligence
To learn more about your emotional intelligence, try these online assessments from the Hay Group, available here: http://www.haygroup.com/leadershipandtalentondemand/your-challenges/emotional-intelligence/online-assessments.aspx
10. Cultural Intelligence
To learn more about cultural intelligence, read the Harvard Business Review article, “Cultural Intelligence,” by P. Christopher Earley and Elaine Mosakowski, available here: https://hbr.org/2004/10/cultural-intelligence
To take a short cultural intelligence profile, visit Erin Meyer’s assessment, “What’s Your Cultural Profile?” in Harvard Business Review, available here: https://hbr.org/web/assessment/2014/08/whats-your-cultural-profile
Additional Resources
1. Blake and Mouton Leadership Grid
To learn more about the leadership grid, read “Balancing Task and People-Oriented Leadership” from Mind Tools, available here: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_73.htm
Activities
1. Entity vs. Incremental Theory
To learn more about Incremental and Entity theory, please refer to page 54-57 (in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team 6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
2. Theory X vs. Theory Y Leadership Style
To learn more about this theory, please refer to page 80 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
3. Blake and Mouton Leadership Grid
To learn more about this theory, please refer to page 59 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
4. Task vs. Person Leadership
To learn more about this theory, please refer to page 59 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation
To learn more about the different types of motivation, please refer to page 66 (Intrinsic Interest) in Thompson, Leigh. 2014. Making the Team (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about intrinsic vs extrinsic motivation, please refer to pages 96-100 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The New Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6. Overconfidence
Please refer to page 165-166 (Overconfidence) in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about overconfidence in judgement, please refer to page 24-25, 316 (Overconfidence) in Thompson, Leigh, 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7. General Happiness Scale
To take the scale, refer to page 114-115 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The New Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8. Personal Cultural Profile
To learn more about your personal cultural profile, refer to page 333-335 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about cultural dimensions refer to Brett, J. M. 2001; 2007; 2014. Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions across Cultural Boundaries. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
9. Analyze Your Network
To analyze your own network through the 6 degrees of Separation Worksheet, refer to page 293-294 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about how to build your network, read Brian Uzzi and Shannon Dunlap’s article, “How to Build Your Network” in Harvard Business Review, available here: https://hbr.org/2005/12/how-to-build-your-network
10. Organization Intelligence
To learn more about how to lead and interact in a virtual world, refer to the Communication Orientation Model on page 287 in Thompson, Leigh, 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Review each type of technology and determine if you are using the best technology to lead your team.
Negotiation
Preparation and Leverage
Develop your BATNA
The winner's curse occurs whenever your first offer is immediately accepted by the counter party.
most of these people often don't have a game plan for negotiation
BATNA is an acronym, and it stands for your best alternative to a negotiated agreement.
BATNA is your backup plan
The course of action you can take if all else fails.
You always have a BATNA. Yours may not be very attractive, but you have a BATNA
BATNA is a course of action that you are going to take, in the event that things don't work out with your negotiation.
Three piece of advice
Don't be passive about developing your BATNA
cultivate your BATNA
BATNAs are dynamic
never reveal your BATNA to the counter-party
If you do, you give up all your leverage
Rather you want a signal that you have options without revealing their exact value.
Third, never lie about your BATNA
If your BATNA is your best course of action outside of the negotiation. Your RP is the lowest amount you can agree to, or highest amount you can pay inside a negotiation.
A reservation price represents the exact monetary equivalent of your BATNA.
Summary
ou always have a BATNA. Even if it means waiting and hoping
you should always try to improve your BATNA
Don't be passive
you should never directly reveal your BATNA to the counter-party, otherwise you lose your leverage
Signal to the other party that you have attractive options
once you determine your BATNA, then you can devise your RP, your reservation price
Target points and Anchoring
people were given a clear reservation price, what some might call a bottom line. Don't dare sell the product for less than this amount.
two kind of negotiators
hope to get at least their bottom line
reach for the stars
Three things to succeed in negotiation
Set target point
BATNA tells when to walk away, not when to sign
3 things decides target point
Interest
What is really important
Main driver for target
Market condition
Conduct research
Ge market data
Information about other parties BATNA
Think about their possible BATNA
Set ZOPA
ZOPA - Zone of possible agreement
the positive or negative overlap between your reservation price and that of the counter-party
Make an opening offer
should I open first or let the other party open?
the person who make the first offer has a strategic advantage
Anchoring effect
The ideal opening offer should be on or near the other party's reservation point.
If you make a wild ass offer, that's a technical term, this results in the Chilling Effect
By making an offer on or near the other parties reservation point you don't insult them because they're secretly willing to pay that amount
Make sure you immediately counter offer with your opening offer
Do this in a relational fashion, not in a positional fashion.
Summary
do as much research as you can to set a target.
Open first but only if you are prepared
Immediately re-anchor if they open first
Plan your opening offer and carry it out
never ask, is this negotiable? Always negotiate
The art of concessions
The key to remember is that we negotiate in long-term relationships with people who have short-term memories
Four advices
First, it is far better to make a large number of small concessions than a small number of large concessions.
Second, do not make unilateral concessions. Never make two or more concessions in a row
Negotiation needs to be a quid pro quo
If necessary, remind the other party where you started and where you are now.
Three, be precise
People habitually use round numbers as first offers and for their concessions
counterparties respond more aggressively to round numbers than to precise numbers.
Negotiators who make precise offers are viewed as more informed than negotiators who make round offers
Fourth, provide a rationale
Win-win negotiations
Win win negotiations
if we never share our interests, we cannot reach win-win outcomes.
Five key skills
Number one, fractionate the negotiation into more than one issue.
First rule of thumb, negotiations cannot have win-win potential unless there are two or more issues.
By definition, negotiations that are only about price are fixed-sum.
By identifying other issues such as payment terms, conditions, volume, quality and so on, it is possible to create win-win negotiations
Number two, prioritize your interests
Second rule of thumb is to prioritize your interests for each issue.
Number three, reveal your interests
Negotiators who revealed information about their interests and priorities improved their own outcomes by an average of 10%.
Number four, ask questions about the other party's priorities.
what is more valuable to you, X or Y? What is your rank ordering of the issues? Would you rather I made a concession on issue Z or issue W? If I gave what you wanted on Z could you give me what I need on Y.
Number five, devise multi-issue proposals that logroll parties' interests
Creating value
Sometimes negotiations break down because parties have fundamentally different views concerning future events that cannot be resolved with existing data, and therefore, need to be put to test
This type of negotiated agreement is known as a contingent contract because the parties involved will gain or lose as a result of an unknown outcome
A contingent contract is essentially a bet between parties who have different beliefs That can only be tested with more time, more data.
Warnings
First and foremost, check your over-confidence
Your data should be better than theirs.
Second, make sure the incentives are aligned
Third, be clear about what data will be used
Decide this up front.
Finally, remember, one party will win the bet and the other party will lose.
Make sure you can pay off the bet if you lose.
Strategies
MIO
multi-issue offers
It is far better to negotiate packages or bundles of issues using a strategy known as MIOs, multi issue offers
negotiators who use MIOs we're always able to reach deals and avoid costly impasse.
MESO
Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers.
You are in an ideal position to prepare two or more multi-issue proposals that are of equal value to yourself.
Present deals to other party
By doing so you appear flexible
Warning do not tell the other party the monetary value of these proposals
If the other party rejects both or all of your options, ask him of her to rank order them
Discern interest
PSS
post-settlement settlements
After negotiators reach a deal both parties brainstorm for a mutually better outcome, with the understanding that the current deal is a commitment unless both parties are willing to change.
Explain to the counter-party that the process is mutual value creation.
neither party has unilateral veto power
Three Considerations
First and foremost, there needs to be enough trust to have this post-deal conversation
Second, you need to consider your opportunity cost
Third, if you are dangerously close to your reservation price, a post-settlement settlement might create a lot more value
Summary
refusing to share any information severely reduces win-win potential
make multi issue proposals
invite counter proposals.
once you reach agreement, search for post settlement settlements
solve differences of belief. By crafting contingent contracts
Disputes and conflict escalation
Interests, Rights and Power
Conflict occurs whenever people believe they have opposing interests or beliefs regarding an outcome or a process
A dispute is a specific type of conflict.
a dispute exists whenever a claim has been made by one party and rejected by the other party
use the interests, rights, and power model of disputes to analyze our own and the others' behavior.
Power
A power move refers to any statement or behavior in which a person attempts to force or coerce another person
take it or leave it, that's my last offer, or this is non-negotiable
power is often reciprocated and encourages escalation.
The other party can call your bluff.
Rights
When negotiators justify their offers with an appeal to fair standards, legal precedent, past practice, customer service, and market condition, this is rights
negotiators often reciprocate the right strategy with rights
Results in conflict escalation
Interest
any behavior in which parties attempt to understand the needs and interests of the other party
When negotiators use interests, they resist the urge to teach the other party a lesson or show them who's boss.
When negotiators use interests, they separate the people from the problem.
Summary
First, ask why and why-not questions.
Second, don't focus on a single option.
Attempt to generate multiple options or courses of action.
Finally, most important, reward and reciprocate the use of interest by the other party
Conflict escalation and Irrational people
Displays of anger were not a predictor of divorce.
The key predictor of divorce was anger combined with a personal attack.
Contempt
Five strategies to redirect conversation to interest
First, don't reciprocate.
The best way of extinguishing rights and power is simply not to reciprocate it.
Second, don't get personal.
Third, send a mixed message.
combine power and interest or rights and interests.
Power and interest: show the other party that we cannot be taken advantage of.
Fourth, meet face to face
People tend to use more power and right strategies when they communicate virtually
solve conflicts and disputes face to face.
single-text strategy
make some proposals and then invite the other party to edit
to be trilingual, meaning, I want you to be able to use all three strategies at the right time.
Rights and power are warranted
One, when the other party will not come to the table.
Two, when you have exhausted all of your options.
Third, when the other party is not taking you seriously
When we're in conflict, we get emotional and we're likely to use power or rights
There is a time to use rights and power, and a way to use power
When using power, be clear about what actions are needed.
But, find a way to help parties save face
Remember, the whole idea is to de-escalate conflict.
Reputation and ethics
Five types of ethically questionable behavior
Competitive bargaining refers to, well being a hard ass.
When negotiators use this behavior, they make outrageous demands, or convey an impression that they are in no hurry when actually they are.
Attacking an opponents network, this negotiator may attempt to get their opponent fired or appear foolish in front of their boss.
This negotiator makes verbal agreements that they know dang good and well they cannot honor, misrepresentation.
They misrepresent information in order to serve their own interests
Attempting to undermine someone's credibility or reputation is another example, making false promises.
Inappropriate information gathering.
attempts to gain information about an opponent through illegal or inappropriate means
Perceived acceptability of unethical negotiation tactics
Most people do not regard traditional competitive bargaining to be unethical
People do regard the four other types of behavior, false promises, misrepresentation, inappropriate information gathering, and undermining the opponent to be unethical.
Finally, most people regard themselves to be more ethical than others.
The statistics, most negotiators feel that others behaved less than ethically, about 40% of the time
Double Standard of perceived ehics
we judge others harshly and we look at ourselves generously
It is very important to put our own self-serving perceptions aside, and manage our reputation in negotiation
Four earned reputation of negotiators
Liar-manipulators will do anything to gain advantage.
people act very defensively with manipulators,
Tough-but-honest negotiators are tough but they don't lie
The tough and nice negotiators are more likely to engender win-win strategies from their opponent.
Nice-and-reasonable negotiators make concessions in a quid pro quo fashion
Cream-puffs make a great deal of concessions regardless of what the other party does.
people take advantage
Summary
First, in the age of the Internet and iPhone, managing your reputation is monumentally important.
Second, you have a more favorable view of yourself than anyone, so it is important to seek unbiased feedback
Finally, you need to be proactive when at the negotiation table
Ask questions, ask for evidence, and suggest contingencies when the information you need is not available
Exploratory activities
Activities
1. Preparation for Negotiations
To learn more about preparing and analyzing a negotiation before it commences, access the Preparation Worksheet for Negotiations on page 33 In Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
2. BATNA and Reservation Price
To learn more about developing a BATNA and understanding your reservation price, refer to page 15 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, and complete steps 1-4 in exhibit 2.1.
3. Subjective Value Inventory
To take the Subjective Value Inventory, refer to page 135-136 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
4. Emotional Style Questionnaire
To assess your own strategic use of emotion, take the Emotional Style Questionnaire on page 105 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5. Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies
Take the Self-Reported Inappropriate Negotiations Strategies Scale (SINS II) available here: https://www.scribd.com/document/276994860/The-SINS-II-Scale-pdf .
To learn more about detecting and dealing with ethically questionable negotiation behavior, refer to pages 166-178 and exhibit 8.1 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6. Win-Win Negotiations
To learn more about Win-Win negotiations, explore the most commonly used strategies and errors on pages 67-78 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7. Team-on-Team Negotiation
To learn more about how to prepare for a team-on-team negotiation, refer to page 233 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8. Interests, Rights, and Power
To learn your power score and explore interests, rights, and power in a negotiation, refer to page 186-188 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. The Truth about Negotiations (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9. Conflict Escalation
To learn more about how to deal with virtual negotiations when conflict occurs, review exhibit 12.2 on page 310 in Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Determine if you are using the correct correspondence when working with escalation of conflict in a negotiation.
10. Negotiate a Job Offer
To learn more about how to negotiate a job offer, refer to appendix 1, page 295 Thompson, Leigh. 2020. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Suggested readings
1. Subjective Value Inventory
To learn more about Subjective Value Inventory and what people value when they negotiate, read Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006). What Do People Value When They Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493-512, available here: http://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/publications.html
Teamwork
Building your team
Goal setting
Team working together for long is predictor for success
A team is an interdependent group of people working towards a shared goal
Successful team
Expertise
Engagement
Execution
Team design depends on the goal of the team
3 type of work
Tactical
more time they spend practicing together, the better they perform.
The key for tactical teamwork is training together.
Problem solving
When the goal is to solve a problem that does not have a well defined solution, this is known as a problem-solving team
Need lot of trust
Benevolence based trust means I trust your intentions.
Competency based trust or respect means I trust your expertise.
Creative
as a team leader, know the goal of your team so you can set the stage for optimal performance
Size and diversity
it's not enough to put your most talented people on the same team and just hope that magic happens.
Most leaders approach team building like a cocktail party
2 big issues
First, the average team size is too big.
Second, teams tend to be too homogenous
2 big bias
The overstaffing bias refers to the fact that teams are too large.
People wanna be politically correct and inclusive, so we've put everyone on a team and teams are no longer special
To void bias and issues- 4 techniques
Jeff Bezos' two pizza rule
AT&T seven plus-or-minus two rule
Harvard single digit rule
Bare minimum rule
hoose the fewest number of people necessary to accomplish the task.
Homogenity bias the fact that people unconsciously build teams that are, well, too much alike
Most people choose members based on personality, not expertise
ideal type of diversity is deep level diversity
Based on expertise, training, thinking styles,
A fault line is a dividing line that separates teams into distinct subgroups based on one or more attributes such as race, gender, functional area, etc.
Faultlines in teams create an unhealthy us versus them culture.
Treating fault lines
First and foremost, diagnose them early
Second, create energy and excitement around the task
Third, when conflict emerges, build trust.
Build dream teams
Assemble fewest number of people possible
Create people vs skill/competency grid and analyse it
Avoid overlap
Avoid homogenity
Check for fault lines
Diverse team has potential for more conflict
Roles and rules
a lack of engagement or free riding is the number one issue that keeps leaders up at night.
The team charter is my favorite tool to combat free riders
Charter need to be authored by team
Team charter
Goals
asked them to write a one sentence description of the team goal.
Teams would be a lot better served if they revisited their overarching goal at the beginning of each meeting.
Responsibilities
people are members of teams, but they don't know why they're there, and they don't know who's calling the shots
Leader and team responsibility
In a manager-led team, the team is responsible for executing the task, and the leader is responsible for selecting the team members and monitoring and managing performance processes.
In a self-managing team, the team not only executes the task, but they, not the leader, are in charge of monitoring and managing their own performance.
Self-directing, also known as self-designing teams, do all the things that self-managing teams do. But in addition, they select, recruit, and staff the team. They have border control.
Self-governing teams do all the things that self-directing teams do, but in addition, they have some influence over the larger organization.
Self-governing teams do all the things that self-directing teams do, but in addition, they have some influence over the larger organization.
If you are not transparent about your relationship with the team, the risk you take is that people will feel over-managed or under-led.
Norms
Teams that declare we have no rules ultimately become paralyzed by dysfunctional norms.
many teams never discuss rules of engagement.
the least conscientious people will set bad norms
Well designed teams with poor leaders outperform poorly designed teams with good leaders
it is never too late to develop a team charter.
Treat the charter like a live plant, revisit it, adjust
Whats working
Whats not working
What should be added
DIscuss with team, what kind of relationship you have in your team
Team decision making
Evidence-based management
Churchill realized that, as a leader, he was larger than life, and that his team would want to agree with him
Churchill further instructed his team to depress him with the bleakest, most depressing facts and figures
Teams should make decisions like scientists
Namely they should develop hypothesis, devise critical tests, and be data-driven rather than outcome driven
Inquiry vs Advocay
Inquiry means scientific hypothesis testing
Throw away theory
Put pride aside
Advocacy means making an argument and attempting to support it
Throw away data
In the face of adverse evidence, should you throw away data or your theory?
Effective decision making Principles
Use debate norms vs polite norms
The Politeness Ritual refers to the fact that people often say nice things rather than what they really think.
leave status at the and titles at the door
Japanese decision making process
Lower status and title speaks first and then it goes upwards
Three, conduct private votes on sensitive important issues.
People conform when voting publicly, but they speak their mind when voting privately.
Four, invite different perspectives
Devil's advocate
It is far better to have a person who genuinely disagrees with the group speak up than a person who pretends to disagree with the group
Five, hold multiple short meetings versus one long meeting.
Short, frequent meetings allow group members to assimilate information and challenge each others views
show case failures.
The company knows that failures give everyone lots of valuable information.
The problem with most learning organizations is that everybody wants to learn by observation, not by first hand experience.
Optimizing conflict
When people use titles to address others, they're unconsciously deferring to the other person
debate, conflict, and confrontation are necessary to make optimal decisions, particularly in life or death situations.
Most people have been raised to believe that conflict and disagreement are bad and strain relationships.
Two types of conflict
Task conflict
disagreements about the work to be done
Not attack on people
Help group perform better
Relationship conflict
personality-based conflict
negatively affects group performance
How to resolve relationship conflict
Step one, team re-design.
examine the structure of the team
Step two, team coaching
Sometimes conflict emerges from the norms and meeting style of the team
Step three, conflict skills.
team members have different experiences with regard to conflict and expressing disagreement.
Step four, personal coaching
Wagemen and Donnenfeld's four-pronged approach
Summary
conflict is a sign of a high performance team.
effective conflict management is a teachable skill
as a leader you need to role model the kind of debate you want to have
Virtual teams
Types of team
Traditional
Traditional teams are physically close and spend much time together.
Hybrid
They are sometimes co-located, but they often are spread out across the globe
Virtual
Purely virtual teams are never in the same place at the same time.
Rely heavily on technology to communicate
Tuckman group development stages
Forming
it is important to be clear about the team boundaries
In terms of selection, talent trumps location
Most talented > Most convinient
Storming
Conflict
People on virtual teams often fall prey to the negativity effect.
Lack of feedback and visual indication
leads to more impulsive, aggressive behavior in virtual groups as compared to face to face interaction
Positive as neutral and neutral as negative inference
Harsher feedback
Mechanism to resolve conflicts
Humanize members
Humanize yourself
Socialize before getting down to business
Avoid email if you can pick up phone and talsk
Norming
Establishing norms and rules of engagement is vital for virtual teams.
Avoid technology in face to face meeting
Create a team charter, be clear about the mission
Appoint a team coach for meeting and relationship management.
Appoint a technology coach to troubleshoot problems.
Performing
If you have established effective norms, you are ready to perform virtually
Check on weekly basis
Shorter, more frequent meetings
Adjourning
When the project ends, have a debrief session.
What worked well
What did not work so well
What should be different next time
Team creativity
Creativity and innovation
Most leaders and executives are not professional recording artists, but they can learn about creative from recording artists.
Creativity
Creativity is the production of novel and useful ideas
Ideation
Innovation
Innovation is the production of actual ideas in the form of products and services also known as implementation
In business, success is 5% strategy, 95% execution.
And one of the things that we will learn is that there are a lot of ugly ducklings that eventually become beautiful swans
Measuring Creativity
Guilford's 3-factor model
Fluency refers to the volume of ideas
No. of ideas generated per person
Flexibility, refers to how many different kinds of ideas a group has.
Groups that are high in flexibility are also high in fluency and originality.
Key factor
Originality means novelty.
Technically, a given idea is deemed to be original if less than 5% of the population, or cohort, generates that idea.
Ideas that are statistically rare can be more valuable
Finke's quadrant model.
creative output can be evaluated in terms of two dimensions, creative versus traditional; realistic vs idealistic
Creative realism
High creativity, High realism
Novel ideas that can work
Creative idealism
High creativity, low realism
Novel ideas in impractical context
Conservative realism
Low creativity, high realism
Old, tried and true ideas
Conservative idealism
Low creativity, low realism
Old ideas put in to impractical context
Need Creative realism ideas
Issues
most people will self-censor, meaning they won't say anything because they're editing and judging
A far better idea is to encourage your team to generate ideas in all four quadrants.
Summary
Creativity starts upstream of innovation
teams that generate a lot of ideas are more likely to have an idea that is original or high in creative realism
encourage people to suggest ideas that are traditional, conservative, and politically incorrect
allow the team to generate a high volume of ideas and set aside judgment
Who's more creative, Groups or individuals?
there's over 50 years of research bearing on this question, and without exception the evidence is that individuals are more creative than teams.
The nominal groups generated about two and a half times more ideas than the real groups, and a significantly greater percentage of their ideas were judged to be of high quality.
four factors that lead groups to be less creative than individuals.
Number one, social loafing or free-riding
his is the tendency for a minority of people to do a majority of the team's work while some people don't contribute to the group
Bigger issue in larger team
Two, conformity
This often occurs without conscious awareness when people bring their behavior in line with what they feel will win them acceptance in a group.
Over time, members grow more similar to one another, homogeneity effect
Three, production blocking.
This refers to anything that interferes with a person's ability to fully focus on the work
Four, performance matching
This refers to the fact that people in groups quickly converge on a group average
the lowest performing members are particularly influential
We call this downward norm-setting
That advice is, work alone. Not on a committee. Not on a team
As leaders, I want you to take charge of your creative team by introducing hybrid strategies and techniques
Best practices for creativity
Three factors spell trouble in creativity during brainstorming
Large group size
dominant personalities
evaluation apprehension
Brainwriting
If brainstorming is the simultaneous verbal generation of ideas in a group, then brainwriting is the simultaneous written generation of ideas in a group
Ten minute to write down as many ideas as possible (one per card)
two rules, no confessions, no guessing
No confessions means that no one should sign their name on a card.
No guessing means that once the cards are taped on a wall or displayed, no one can guess who said what
Voting
Five dots to each person
Timeline
10 min to write
10 min to post
10 min to vote
Benefits
completely neutralizes the alpha dominate people
vocal domination is unrelated to expertise
Five more ideas
First, go for quantity, not quality
the way to get to quality, is to generate a lot of ideas, and then have some principle of selection
Two, break it up.
Groups who take a brief break are more productive in terms of quantity and quality than groups who work for a solid amount of time
Three, change it up.
groups who underwent membership change, generated more ideas, and many more kinds of ideas, higher flexibility, than groups who stayed intact
ou invite an outsider in for your next brainstorming session, you can reap benefits
Four, standup
People generate more creative responses when standing, and in particular, walking, than when sitting
Five, Fess up
we've found that teams that share embarrassing stories generate nearly 30% more ideas than teams who share a prideful story, or no story at all
Summary
First, almost any intervention can improve creativity.
Second, the simplest strategy is to stand up and bifurcate the creative session into two distinct halves
challenge teams to double their creative output in the second half.
Finally, changing group composition by inviting outsiders can increase creativity.
Exploratory activity
Activities
1. Benevolence vs Competency Based Trust
To take a questionnaire on trust in your teams, refer to page 147-148 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The New Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about trust vs. respect, refer to page 96 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
2. Faultlines
To learn more about faultlines, refer to page 257 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
3. Decision Making
To take the Decision making quiz and learn more about measuring your over-confidence, refer to pages 166-166 (Overconfidence) in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about howto be rational in the decision making process, access the MAUT theory and develop your own spreadsheet to help you make your decision. Refer to pages 304-305 in Thompson, Leigh, (2020). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
4. Relationship vs Task Conflict
To learn more about relationship vs. task conflict, please refer to pages 197 (types of conflict) and 200 (types of conflict and work team effectiveness) in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5. Conflict Intervention
To learn more about conflict intervention, refer to page 214 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6. Virtual Teams
To learn more about virtual teams, refer to Chapter 12, Virtual Teamwork. To review the virtual meeting checklist refer to page 319 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about how to lead a virtual team refer to exhibit 12-5 (Intergenerational Negotiation Norms and Beliefs) on page 290, in Thompson, Leigh, (2020). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Review the values, communication preferences, trust capacity, and negotiation beliefs among the different members on your team and determine the best way to virtually communicate and lead them
7. Creativity
To take the Creative Collaboration Assessment , please refer to pages 24-31 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The New Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Take the Creativity quiz on page 183-186 (exhibit 9-1). The answers are on page 203-206 (exhibit 9-5) in Thompson, Leigh,(2020). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8. Brainstorming
To learn more about brainstorming, refer to page 228 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
To learn more about the development of brainstorming and how to use it in your team, refer to pages 152-160 in Thompson, Leigh. 2013. Creative Conspiracy: The New Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9. Brainwriting
To learn more about brainwriting, refer to page 230 in Thompson, Leigh. 2018. Making the Team (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Watch Leigh Thompson’s video short on brainwriting, available here: https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/news_articles/2014/06262014-video-thompson-brainwriting.aspx
Suggested Readings
1. Collaborative Team Questionnaire
To take the collaborative team questionnaire, refer to page 29 in Lafasto, F.M.J., & Larson, C.E. (2001). When teams work best: 6,000 team member and leaders tell what it takes to succeed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Group Development
Read more about Tuckman's Model of Group Development from George Williams College’s InfEd website, available here: http://infed.org/mobi/bruce-w-tuckman-forming-storming-norming-and-performing-in-groups/
Suggested Text book
Making the Team: A Guide for Managers
Thompson, L. (2018). Making the team: A guide for managers (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.