Freud stresses the infantile origins of personality whereas Jung emphasized the racial origins of personality
Similar to Freud- emphasis on similarities not differences
predomance of personality structure explains individual differences in personality
2nd most infulential theory- especially on trait theorists
intro/extraversion in all factor-analytical personality theories
Adler 1923- Individual Psychology
critisises Freud and Jung for over emphasising biological,- not attention on social
innate potential for relating to others
social interest= survival thru cooperation
Birth Order
1st = conformist and individually oriented
middle = best-adjusted of all children
APA 1984- Middle child= juvenile delinquency & adult criminality high
Last = relatively non-conformist and interpersonally oriented
Overcompensation
Striving for Superiority
Lifestyle Typology
Helped establish psy as social science- but not v.influential
2nd tier psychodynamic
Sullivan 1953
Interpersonal week 4
Wiggins
Fromm
Leary
Murray's Personology Theory
Identity, humanistic/existential, factor-analytic trait, cognitive/behavioural, and personal construct theories
Factor-Analytic trait theories
Factor anlaysis an extremely useful tool in assessing the internal validity of psychological scales –as a means toward identifying the major personality traits.
Cattell 1943
Cattell simplifies trait universe by finding basic structure relied on factor analysis- thus correlation coefficients
4.5K List of traits >semantically similar clusters of synonyms > paired semantic opposites= 160 >+ more from litrature >choose representative term = 171 terms
100 ppl rated others on 171 terms> corelations identifed within terms=60 terms
> cattells analysis and scrunty of terms & literature =35 terms
> Factor analysis of rating data (L-Data) from more ppls ratings of personality produced 12 terms + 4 from additional studies
1st survey of personality traits based on Allports trait theory
Temperament (personality) traits =(15)
Ability trait = 1 (Intellengence)
Critisms
The 16PF not as widely --or in as controversial a manner --as the MBTI.
-ve--Cattell’s attempt to include intelligence as a personality trait insistence on maintaining a large number of correlated trait dimensions disdain for certain tests of reliability.
factor rotations done by hand= mistakes- However Cattell insisted on using 7/9 to 16(23 for abnormal)
personality traits are manifestations of chronically experienced emotions
Eysenck 1967
The 'Big Two'---Originally proposed all major personality traits could be captures by 2- Neurotiticism & extraversion dimensions
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire EPQ 1967
Extraversion link to ARAS
Neurotiicism link to Autonomic Nervous System - ANS
Gray 1981-response
Eysenck Personality Inventory EPI 1976
Psychoticism = 3 constructs
Conscientiousness.... following ones intentions
Openess....explore other perspectives
Agreeableness...friendly towards others
Critisms
Cattells Critism
cattell and eysenck differ in factor analysis/rotation methodology
Eysenck = Orthogonal method
Cattell = Oblique method
Cattell used Factor analysis in an exploratory way to discover personality [raits
Eysenck used factor analysis to test previously formulated hypotheses about likely personality traits
too few factors
Psychoticism = ill-defined +mislabled?
Contributions
popularising research on extraversion and neuroticism
encouraged interest in Jung's analytical psy
Seen as Cattell & Eysenck have 2 diff conceptualisations of personality one must be wrong?
E- a few factors preferred C- detailed analysis
Costa & McCrae 1985
the "Big Five" personallity traits--OCEAN
Most influential studies using Cattells trait rating scales
in both studies--subjects split into small groups- and rated others on bipolar personality trait scales--factor analysed to produce the Big 5
Tubes & Christal 1961
Norman 1963
cattell has too many factors because he used unreliable scales
B5 found in childrens & older adults ratings
Costa & McCrae 1985- BIG5 popular revision
NEO-PI- 1985 = measure of the Big5
originally only 3- additional work uncovered 2 more
Critisisms
too few factors
western based, but can be generalised universally
contributions
A good compromise between Cattell and Eysenck
accomodates by most if not all personality trait theories
Openness
open to experience as revealed by their artistic and intellectual interests, their creativity and imagination, the liberal, untraditional values, independence and impracticalness.
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeability
Neuroticism
Intergration Big 5 & Interpersonal trait perspectives
Wiggins 1979
(circular) Circumplex Model of Interpersonal Traits
not originally interested in explaining all of personality
Intrest in explaining traits reflected in behaviour to others
Replicated Learys interpersonal trait axes of Dominance and Nurturance
Expanded IASR-B5 to include Big5
Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex (AB5C) measures Big Five & interpersonal traits simultaneously
Keys to intergration
Big5 Extraversion = Interpersonal High Dominance & Nurturance
Big5 Agreeableness= low Dominance & High Nurturance
Costa & McCrae moved to Bio perspectives/ Wiggins maintained Social perspectives
Factor Analytic Criticism
Allport 1937
Most Factor-Analytic trait theorist= clinical not academic research
the factors in these theories have no true relations to actual individuals, they misrepresent reality
critisisms based on allports background
--critisism come from idiographic work---work on individuals
rather than what hes famous for -Nomothetic work--work on large groups
dispite a reduction in Allport & Odbers -1936 traits- it has Increased popularity of Allports trait theory