knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience
emphasizes the role of experience and evidence, especially sensory experience, in the formation of ideas, over the notion of innate ideas or traditions
traditions (or customs) arise due to relations of previous sense experiences
emphasizes evidence, especially as discovered in experiments
fundamental part of the scientific method
hypotheses and theories must be tested against observations
rather than resting solely on a priori reasoning, intuition, or revelation
"knowledge is based on experience"
"knowledge is tentative and probabilistic, subject to continued revision and falsification."
sensory experience creates knowledge
experiments and validated measurement tools, guides empirical research
Background
no knowledge to be properly inferred or deduced unless it is derived from one's sense-based experience
contrasted with rationalism
knowledge may be derived from reason independently of the senses
Early empiricism
tabula rasa
"clean slate" or "blank tablet"
mind as an originally blank or empty recorder on which experience leaves marks
denies that humans have innate ideas
Aristotle
theory of potentiality and actuality
experience of sense perceptions still requires the help of the active nous
contrasted with Platonic notions of the human mind
entity that pre- existed somewhere in the heavens, before being sent down to join a body on Earth
Phaedo
Apology
Stoic school
the mind starts blank, but acquires knowledge as the outside world is impressed upon it
Islamic philosophers
Al Farabi
Avicenna
tabula rasa is a pure potentiality that is actualized through education
knowledge is attained through "empirical familiarity with objects in this world from which one abstracts universal concepts"
developed through a "syllogistic method of reasoning in which observations lead to propositional statements which when compounded lead to further abstract concepts
intellect itself develops from a material intellect, which is a potentiality "that can acquire knowledge to the active intellect
Ibn Tufail
Abu Bakr Ibn Tufail
tabula rasa as a thought experiment in his Arabic philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqdhan
influence on John Locke's formulation of tabula rasa in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
Thomas Aquinas
senses are essential to mind into scholasticism
Renaissance Italy
Niccolò Machiavelli
people should study the "effectual truth"
Francesco Guicciardini
Leonardo da Vinci
abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings
Vincenzo Galilei
successfully solving musical problems
tuning such as the relationship of pitch to string tension and mass in stringed instruments, and to volume of air in wind instruments
through his tuning research, found the underlying truth at the heart of the misunderstood myth of 'Pythagoras' hammers' (the square of the numbers concerned yielded those musical intervals, not the actual numbers, as believed)
to composition, by his various suggestions to composers in his Dialogo della musica antica e moderna
essential pedagogical influence upon the young Galileo, his eldest son
British empiricism
term used to describe differences perceived between two of its founders of modern philosophy and modern science
Francis Bacon
empiricist
René Descartes
rationalist
next generation
Thomas Hobbes
empiricist
Baruch Spinoza
rationalist
empiricists in 18th century Enlightenment
John Locke
normally known as the founder of empiricism
response to the early-to-mid-17th century "continental rationalism"
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
the only knowledge humans can have is a posteriori, i.e., based upon experience
There are two sources of our ideas: sensation and reflection
a distinction is made between simple and complex ideas
former are unanalysable, and are broken down into primary and secondary qualities
Primary qualities are essential for the object in question to be what it is
Secondary qualities are the sensory information we can perceive from its primary qualities
complex ideas combine simple ones simple ones, and divide into substances, modes, and relations
our knowledge of things is a perception of ideas that are in accordance or discordance with each other
George Berkeley
Locke's view immediately opened a door that would lead to eventual atheism
Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
things only exist either as a result of their being perceived, or by virtue of the fact that they are an entity doing the perceiving
any order humans may see in nature is the language or handwriting of God
subjective idealism
David Hume
moved empiricism to a new level of skepticism
divided all of human knowledge into two categories
relations of ideas
ex. Mathematical and logical propositions
matters of fact
contingent observation of the world
ideas", in turn, are derived from their "impressions
Ideas are therefore the faint copies of sensations
all knowledge, even the most basic beliefs about the natural world, cannot be conclusively established by reason
beliefs are more a result of accumulated habits, developed in response to accumulated sense experiences
problem of induction
it requires inductive reasoning to arrive at the premises for the principle of inductive reasoning
the justification for inductive reasoning is a circular argument
there is no certainty that the future will resemble the past
we cannot know with certainty by inductive reasoning that the sun will continue to rise in the East
belief in an external world and belief in the existence of the self were not rationally justifiable
these beliefs were to be accepted nonetheless because of their profound basis in instinct and custom
lasting legacy, however, was the doubt that his skeptical arguments cast on the legitimacy of inductive reasoning
Phenomenalism
an extreme empiricist theory
a physical object is a kind of construction out of our experiences
the view that physical objects, properties, events (whatever is physical) are reducible to mental objects, properties, events. Ultimately, only mental objects, properties, events, exist
to have a visual experience of a real physical thing is to have an experience of a certain kind of group of experiences
John Stuart Mill
matter is the "permanent possibility of sensation"
induction is necessary for all meaningful knowledge including mathematics
mathematical truths were merely very highly confirmed generalizations from experience
no real place for knowledge based on relations of ideas
logical and mathematical necessity is psychological
most extreme version of empiricism known, but it has not found many defenders
knowledge of any kind is not from direct experience but an inductive inference from direct experience
problems other philosophers have had with Mill's position
encounters difficulty when it describes what direct experience is by differentiating only between actual and possible sensations
misses some key discussion concerning conditions under which such "groups of permanent possibilities of sensation" might exist in the first place
Berkeley put God in that gap
Mill, essentially left the question unanswered
lacking an acknowledgement of an aspect of "reality" that goes beyond mere "possibilities of sensation"
leads to a version of subjective idealism
how trees continue to grow while unobserved and untouched by human hands, etc., remain unanswered
leaves open the unsettling possibility that the "gap-filling entities are purely possibilities and not actualities at all
by calling mathematics merely another species of inductive inference, misapprehends mathematics
fails to fully consider the structure and method of mathematical science,
ended by the 1940s
statements about physical things could not be translated into statements about actual and possible sense data
there is no finite set of statements about actual and possible sense-data from which we can deduce even a single physical-object statement
no finite set of statements that are couched in purely sensory terms and can express the satisfaction of the condition of the presence of a normal observer
Logical empiricism
also logical positivism or neopositivism
synthesize the essential ideas of British empiricism
with certain insights from mathematical logic
Gottlob Frege
Ludwig Wittgenstein
key figures
Otto Neurath
Moritz Schlick
A.J. Ayer
Rudolf Carnap
Hans Reichenbach
Vienna Circle
saw in the logical symbolism a powerful instrument that could rationally reconstruct all scientific discourse into an ideal, logically perfect, language that would be free of the ambiguities and deformations of natural language.
Gottlob Frege
Bertrand Russell
combining:
Frege's thesis that all mathematical truths are logical
Wittgenstein's idea that all logical truths are mere linguistic tautologies
arrived at a twofold classification of all propositions:
analytic (a priori)
synthetic (a posteriori)
verification principle
demarcation between sentences that have sense and those that do not
most metaphysical, ethical, aesthetic and other traditional philosophical problems came to be considered pseudoproblems.
abandoned this sort of phenomenalism in favor of a rational reconstruction of knowledge into the language of an objective spatio-temporal physics
instead of translating sentences about physical objects into sense-data, such sentences were to be translated into so-called protocol sentences
"X at location Y and at time T observes such and such."
central theses
verificationism, the analytic-synthetic distinction, reductionism, etc.
came under sharp attack
Nelson Goodman
W.V. Quine
Hilary Putnam
Karl Popper
Richard Rorty
contemporary analytic philosopher
Michael Dummett
anti-realists
Pragmatism
Charles Sanders Peirce
"pragmaticism"
integrates the basic insights of empirical (experience- based) and rational (concept-based) thinking
highly influential in laying the groundwork for today's empirical scientific method
concurred with the main ideas of rationalism
the idea that rational concepts can be meaningful and the idea that rational concepts necessarily go beyond the data given by empirical observation
emphasized the concept-driven side of the then ongoing debate between strict empiricism and strict rationalism
to counterbalance the excesses to which some of his cohorts had taken pragmatism under the "data-driven" strict-empiricist view
to place inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning in a complementary rather than competitive mode
abductive reasoning
the objects of knowledge are real things
the characters (properties) of real things do not depend on our perceptions of them
everyone who has sufficient experience of real things will agree on the truth about them
primary conceptual foundation for the empirically based scientific method today
The rationality of the scientific method does not depend on the certainty of its conclusions, but on its self-corrective character: by continued application of the method science can detect and correct its own mistakes, and thus eventually lead to the discovery of truth"
three cotary propositions of pragmatism
the peripatetic-thomist observation
link between sensory perception and intellectual conception is a two-way street
whatever we find in the intellect is also incipiently in the senses
perception itself can be seen as a species of abductive inference
it is beyond control and hence beyond critique
incorrigible
it is only the immediate percept in its unique individuality or "thisness"
haecceity
Scientific concepts
are general in nature, and transient sensations do in another sense find correction within them
notion of perception as abduction has received periodic revivals in artificial intelligence and cognitive science research
Irvin Rock on indirect perception
William James
"radical empiricism"
offshoot of his form of pragmatism
the empirically observed "directly apprehended universe needs ... no extraneous trans-empirical connective support"
to rule out the perception that there can be any value added by seeking supernatural explanations for natural phenomena
John Dewey
modified James' pragmatism
instrumentalism
experience as unified totality of things through which everything else is interrelated
reality is determined by past experience
humans adapt their past experiences of things to perform experiments upon and test the pragmatic values of such experience
value of such experience is measured experientially and scientifically
results of such tests generate ideas that serve as instruments for future experimentation