1. Arguments
    1. pro
      1. protect individual autonomy, personality, privacy
      2. promotes fair competition
  2. Basis
    1. contract
    2. tort
    3. property
    4. equity
    5. sui generis
      1. pesonal privacy
        1. Art 8
  3. Role
    1. commercial information
      1. alternative to patents
      2. can protect ideas which are not copyrightable yet
        1. not really?
      3. m.b. parallel protection to copyright
      4. protect potential patents before disclosure
      5. know-how
  4. Types of information
    1. commercial
    2. personal
    3. government
  5. Requirements
    1. Coco v Clark --- (C designed moped engine - negotiated with Clark - break down - Clark designed similar engine - obligation of confidence, but did not find use of confidential inf)
      1. information capable of being protected
        1. NOT protected
          1. trivial
          2. test
          3. 'unless the circumstances are of sufficient gravity
          4. not 'trivial tittle-tattle'
          5. no specific guidance
          6. types
          7. commercial
          8. private
          9. NOT trivial
          10. address although relatively trivial
          11. personal and sexual relationships, feelings after death of fiance, health, diet
          12. trivial
          13. innocuous, unimportant and unremarkable events
          14. e.g. trip to Italy
          15. governmental
          16. suggested that not apply
          17. because difficult for the courts to decide
          18. immoral
          19. grossly immoral
          20. vague
          21. test
          22. not 'wouldn't it be great if...' --- (Ministry of Sound: - open all night - large and fitted out in hi-tech industrial style - separate areas for drinking, dancing - dance area of high quality - top disc-jockeys all features individually to vague - also not novel (except all night)
          23. beyond simple goal - show 'considerable degree of particularity in a definitive product' --- (TV series about formation of female rock band - subsequent experience - ok - attractiveness and capable of realisation)
          24. factors
          25. level of specificity required in the industry in question --- (in theatre, TV and film industries - m.b. general ideas)
          26. e.g.
          27. mere idea of separating oil and water --- (e-ees left the company to work in this field)
          28. public domain
          29. test
          30. objective - C's desire will not matter
          31. factors
          32. type of inf
          33. personal are interesting to wider public
          34. trade secret is interesting only for competitors
          35. section of public who have interest in knowing inf
          36. degree of publication within that domain
          37. form in which inf is published
          38. vigour with which inf is likely to be pursues within that domain
          39. extent to which further publication will harm --- (no further damage)
          40. m.b. public even if to a small number of people --- (disgraceful conduct of pop-stars on aeroplane - public)
        2. issues
          1. C must identify confidential inf precisely --- (100 out of 246 drawings contain confidential inf - which ones?)
          2. m.b. still confidential if told to friends and relatives --- (showed engravings)
          3. confidentiality of photographs is not taken away by text
          4. publication in other country m.b. relevant --- (patent specification in Belgium)
          5. springboard doctrine cannot be in better position if takes inf from a private source --- (negotiations broke down - unconsciously used new carpet grip)
          6. arguments
          7. pro
          8. promotes integrity of confidential relations
          9. promotes relations between potential competitors
          10. issues
          11. restrictions do not last forever
          12. period is connected to the time which is necessary to discover inf in legitimate public sources
          13. m.b. available from public sources --- (took list of customers from E-er)
          14. encrypted inf
          15. (coin-receiving and -changing mechanisms in vending machines - discriminators which determined authenticity of coins - no confidence - anyone with the necessary skill could de-crypt)
          16. can public information be forgotten and become confidential?
          17. (PRIMODOS drug - for pregnancy test - damaged unborn - later - interview for documentary - ok - injunction)
          18. information already disclosed by confident
          19. cannot be restrained further
          20. BUT!
          21. all other remedies aside from injunction are ok
          22. information collected from public domain
          23. even if difficult to collect, must be some skill of the human brain - not purely automatic
          24. m.b. confidential --- (as managing director - company made swimming pools - learned about previous grant of a patent for similar swimming pool - told nothing - left company - established competing business - in breach - although public - because knew in capacity)
          25. obvious, non-novel inf
          26. m.b. not confidential --- (pretty obvious once one is setting out to create a beat-mix)
          27. personal information
          28. depends on reasonable expectation of privacy
          29. factors --- (Rawling's child)
          30. attributes of C
          31. child, adult?
          32. nature of the activity C is engaged
          33. recreation, public duties?
          34. place where C was
          35. nature and purpose of intrusion
          36. observer was aware of the absence of consent?
          37. effect on C
          38. how inf came into hands of publisher
          39. even if widely disclosed, m.b. retained its private character
          40. photo taken in public place
          41. confidential if include something embarrassing or offensive
          42. although in ECHR
          43. all photos are private
      2. D owes an obligation of confidence
        1. legal obligation
          1. from
          2. express obligation
          3. the nature of relationship
          4. fiduciary relationship
          5. manner of communication
          6. test
          7. would a reasonable recipient have realized that inf given to them in confidence?
          8. express statement
          9. inferred
          10. sources
          11. commonly held views and practices in industry
          12. normal conversation
          13. not if in informal social setting
          14. disclosed for a limited purpose
          15. obligation that only for that purpose
          16. BUT!
          17. m.b. that reasonable recipient might not assume confidence
          18. encrypted material
          19. depends on whether a reasonable recipient would consider that encryption means that confident
          20. BUT!
          21. different from C merely did not want for D to have access held no confidentiality
          22. BUT!
          23. at odds --- (stole a branch with genetic inf from the protected orchard - held confidence)
          24. 3rd party recipient
          25. indirect recipient who is aware of confidential status - bound
          26. grossly negligent in not knowing that confidential - bound
          27. BUT!
          28. ok if careless, naive, stupid or merely knew of an assertion that confidential
          29. does not know, but discovers later - bound from that time --- (papers mistakenly sent to solicitors from other side)
          30. strangers
          31. C acted illegally - police is ok - no obligation for tapping
          32. BUT!
          33. private investigator - owes - cannot illegally acquire
          34. m.b. illegality is more relevant to possibility of injunction
          35. D owes if anything reasonably leads the observer to realize that what he observes is confidential --- (Frankenstein film - Robert de Niro - photo - photographer not invited - 'Absolutely No Photography')
          36. more important than illegality! --- (paid 1m for confidentiality)
          37. personal information
          38. if reasonable expectations
          39. employment
          40. during the course of employment
          41. express
          42. implied
          43. implied duty of fidelity
          44. after employment
          45. express
          46. see if restraint of trade
          47. personal skill, knowledge, experience should be free
          48. implied
          49. Only trade secrets are protected --- (E-ee - sold fresh chicken from vans - inf about customers, prices, products)
          50. types
          51. trade secrets
          52. protected during and after
          53. commercially sensitive inf
          54. protected during employment
          55. e.g.
          56. customers' names and addresses
          57. most convenient routes to reach customers
          58. customers' usual quality and quantity requirements
          59. the days of the week Faccenda called on customers
          60. prices charged to individual customers
          61. e-ee's general skill and knowledge
          62. factors
          63. nature of employment
          64. see if inner counsel of E-er
          65. nature of information
          66. not general business methods and practices
          67. must be defined with precision
          68. whether E-er impressed on E-ee the confidentiality of information
          69. in small business m.b. even if E-er failed to identify
          70. whether inf can be easily isolated from other inf
          71. whether real or significant harm from disclosure
          72. e.g.
          73. chemical formulae
          74. secret manufacturing process
          75. design and special methods of construction
          76. m.b. injunction, but not damages against BF purchaser
          77. the way the parties understand their moral obligations
          78. subjective unspoken views m.b. relevant --- (demonstration of a car-lock device)
      3. duty breached
        1. derivation
          1. ways
          2. direct evidence
          3. indirect
          4. 'significant fingerprint'
          5. persuade the court that D could not have got to this position from legitimate sources
        2. issues
          1. D's state of mind is not relevant
          2. harm is needed?
          3. only in government secrets
          4. the Crown must demonstrate public interest in restraint
          5. personal inf
          6. not needed
          7. more relevant to remedy
          8. small compensation where no harm --- (small to celebrities, but large sum for the journal)
          9. partial use
          10. must have used substantially the same idea --- (copied 2 of 5 features - not enough)
          11. alteration of confidential inf
          12. a matter of degree whether the extent and importance of the use of conf inf is such that continued use of the derived matter should be viewed as use of conf inf
      4. Defences
        1. consent or authorisation
        2. public interest
          1. nature of inf
          2. 'not merely interesting to the public'
          3. types
          4. defence
          5. affects moral, political, medical, or material welfare
          6. m.b. allowed to set the record straight
          7. BUT!
          8. failed in the case because photo - too much
          9. NO defence
          10. entertainment, curiosity or amusement
          11. factors
          12. consequences of non-disclosure
          13. internal papers - alcohol-measuring machine faulty
          14. type of obligation
          15. difficult if express duty
          16. beliefs of the confidant
          17. ok, if believed that iniquity, but not just to check
          18. the party to whom inf is disclosed
          19. newspapers should not confuse their own interest with public
          20. tell the club or the police, not the newspapers --- (Francome breached Jockey Club regulations, possibly criminal offences)
          21. how inf acquired
          22. whether received enumeration
          23. extent to which inf is already in public
      5. remedy
        1. damages
          1. market value of inf - only one factor
        2. account of profits
        3. injunction
  6. Privacy
    1. Naomi Campbell v MGN
    2. Douglas v Hello! Ld Hoffman - follow the money - enough for a breach of confidential information - huge commercial money --- (wedding photos - did not matter if sold right to another magazine)
    3. [Kaye v Robertson] --- (photos taken in the hospital)
    4. [Von Hannover v Germany] misuse of personal information --- (ECHR - little privacy for a princess, but some must be)