-
Arguments
-
pro
- protect individual autonomy, personality, privacy
- promotes fair competition
-
Basis
- contract
- tort
- property
- equity
-
sui generis
-
pesonal privacy
- Art 8
-
Role
-
commercial information
- alternative to patents
-
can protect ideas which are not copyrightable yet
- not really?
- m.b. parallel protection to copyright
- protect potential patents before disclosure
- know-how
-
Types of information
- commercial
- personal
- government
-
Requirements
-
Coco v Clark
---
(C designed moped engine - negotiated with Clark - break down - Clark designed similar engine - obligation of confidence, but did not find use of confidential inf)
-
information capable of being protected
-
NOT protected
- trivial
- test
- 'unless the circumstances are of sufficient gravity
- not 'trivial tittle-tattle'
- no specific guidance
- types
- commercial
- private
- NOT trivial
- address
although relatively trivial
- personal and sexual relationships, feelings after death of fiance, health, diet
- trivial
- innocuous, unimportant and unremarkable events
- e.g. trip to Italy
- governmental
- suggested that not apply
- because difficult for the courts to decide
- immoral
- grossly immoral
- vague
- test
- not 'wouldn't it be great if...'
---
(Ministry of Sound:
- open all night
- large and fitted out in hi-tech industrial style
- separate areas for drinking, dancing
- dance area of high quality
- top disc-jockeys
all features individually to vague - also not novel (except all night)
- beyond simple goal - show 'considerable degree of particularity in a definitive product'
---
(TV series about formation of female rock band - subsequent experience - ok - attractiveness and capable of realisation)
- factors
- level of specificity required in the industry in question
---
(in theatre, TV and film industries - m.b. general ideas)
- e.g.
- mere idea of separating oil and water
---
(e-ees left the company to work in this field)
- public domain
- test
- objective - C's desire will not matter
- factors
- type of inf
- personal are interesting to wider public
- trade secret is interesting only for competitors
- section of public who have interest in knowing inf
- degree of publication within that domain
- form in which inf is published
- vigour with which inf is likely to be pursues within that domain
- extent to which further publication will harm
---
(no further damage)
- m.b. public even if to a small number of people
---
(disgraceful conduct of pop-stars on aeroplane - public)
-
issues
- C must identify confidential inf precisely
---
(100 out of 246 drawings contain confidential inf - which ones?)
- m.b. still confidential if told to friends and relatives
---
(showed engravings)
- confidentiality of photographs is not taken away by text
- publication in other country m.b. relevant
---
(patent specification in Belgium)
- springboard doctrine
cannot be in better position if takes inf from a private source
---
(negotiations broke down - unconsciously used new carpet grip)
- arguments
- pro
- promotes integrity of confidential relations
- promotes relations between potential competitors
- issues
- restrictions do not last forever
- period is connected to the time which is necessary to discover inf in legitimate public sources
- m.b. available from public sources
---
(took list of customers from E-er)
- encrypted inf
- (coin-receiving and -changing mechanisms in vending machines - discriminators which determined authenticity of coins - no confidence - anyone with the necessary skill could de-crypt)
- can public information be forgotten and become confidential?
- (PRIMODOS drug - for pregnancy test - damaged unborn - later - interview for documentary - ok - injunction)
- information already disclosed by confident
- cannot be restrained further
- BUT!
- all other remedies aside from injunction are ok
- information collected from public domain
- even if difficult to collect, must be some skill of the human brain - not purely automatic
- m.b. confidential
---
(as managing director - company made swimming pools - learned about previous grant of a patent for similar swimming pool - told nothing - left company - established competing business - in breach - although public - because knew in capacity)
- obvious, non-novel inf
- m.b. not confidential
---
(pretty obvious once one is setting out to create a beat-mix)
- personal information
- depends on reasonable expectation of privacy
- factors
---
(Rawling's child)
- attributes of C
- child, adult?
- nature of the activity C is engaged
- recreation, public duties?
- place where C was
- nature and purpose of intrusion
- observer was aware of the absence of consent?
- effect on C
- how inf came into hands of publisher
- even if widely disclosed, m.b. retained its private character
- photo taken in public place
- confidential if include something embarrassing or offensive
- although in ECHR
- all photos are private
-
D owes an obligation of confidence
-
legal obligation
- from
- express obligation
- the nature of relationship
- fiduciary relationship
- manner of communication
- test
- would a reasonable recipient have realized that inf given to them in confidence?
- express statement
- inferred
- sources
- commonly held views and practices in industry
- normal conversation
- not if in informal social setting
- disclosed for a limited purpose
- obligation that only for that purpose
- BUT!
- m.b. that reasonable recipient might not assume confidence
- encrypted material
- depends on whether a reasonable recipient would consider that encryption means that confident
- BUT!
- different from C merely did not want for D to have access
held no confidentiality
- BUT!
- at odds
---
(stole a branch with genetic inf from the protected orchard - held confidence)
- 3rd party recipient
- indirect recipient who is aware of confidential status - bound
- grossly negligent in not knowing that confidential - bound
- BUT!
- ok if careless, naive, stupid or merely knew of an assertion that confidential
- does not know, but discovers later - bound from that time
---
(papers mistakenly sent to solicitors from other side)
- strangers
- C acted illegally - police is ok - no obligation for tapping
- BUT!
- private investigator - owes - cannot illegally acquire
- m.b. illegality is more relevant to possibility of injunction
- D owes if anything reasonably leads the observer to realize that what he observes is confidential
---
(Frankenstein film - Robert de Niro - photo - photographer not invited - 'Absolutely No Photography')
- more important than illegality!
---
(paid 1m for confidentiality)
- personal information
- if reasonable expectations
- employment
- during the course of employment
- express
- implied
- implied duty of fidelity
- after employment
- express
- see if restraint of trade
- personal skill, knowledge, experience should be free
- implied
- Only trade secrets are protected
---
(E-ee - sold fresh chicken from vans - inf about customers, prices, products)
- types
- trade secrets
- protected during and after
- commercially sensitive inf
- protected during employment
- e.g.
- customers' names and addresses
- most convenient routes to reach customers
- customers' usual quality and quantity requirements
- the days of the week Faccenda called on customers
- prices charged to individual customers
- e-ee's general skill and knowledge
- factors
- nature of employment
- see if inner counsel of E-er
- nature of information
- not general business methods and practices
- must be defined with precision
- whether E-er impressed on E-ee the confidentiality of information
- in small business m.b. even if E-er failed to identify
- whether inf can be easily isolated from other inf
- whether real or significant harm from disclosure
- e.g.
- chemical formulae
- secret manufacturing process
- design and special methods of construction
- m.b. injunction, but not damages against BF purchaser
- the way the parties understand their moral obligations
- subjective unspoken views m.b. relevant
---
(demonstration of a car-lock device)
-
duty breached
-
derivation
- ways
- direct evidence
- indirect
- 'significant fingerprint'
- persuade the court that D could not have got to this position from legitimate sources
-
issues
- D's state of mind is not relevant
- harm is needed?
- only in government secrets
- the Crown must demonstrate public interest in restraint
- personal inf
- not needed
- more relevant to remedy
- small compensation where no harm
---
(small to celebrities, but large sum for the journal)
- partial use
- must have used substantially the same idea
---
(copied 2 of 5 features - not enough)
- alteration of confidential inf
- a matter of degree whether the extent and importance of the use of conf inf is such that continued use of the derived matter should be viewed as use of conf inf
-
Defences
- consent or authorisation
-
public interest
- nature of inf
- 'not merely interesting to the public'
- types
- defence
- affects moral, political, medical, or material welfare
- m.b. allowed to set the record straight
- BUT!
- failed in the case
because photo - too much
- NO defence
- entertainment, curiosity or amusement
- factors
- consequences of non-disclosure
- internal papers - alcohol-measuring machine faulty
- type of obligation
- difficult if express duty
- beliefs of the confidant
- ok, if believed that iniquity, but not just to check
- the party to whom inf is disclosed
- newspapers should not confuse their own interest with public
- tell the club or the police, not the newspapers
---
(Francome breached Jockey Club regulations, possibly criminal offences)
- how inf acquired
- whether received enumeration
- extent to which inf is already in public
-
remedy
-
damages
- market value of inf - only one factor
- account of profits
- injunction
-
Privacy
- Naomi Campbell v MGN
- Douglas v Hello!
Ld Hoffman - follow the money - enough for a breach of confidential information - huge commercial money
---
(wedding photos - did not matter if sold right to another magazine)
- [Kaye v Robertson]
---
(photos taken in the hospital)
- [Von Hannover v Germany]
misuse of personal information
---
(ECHR - little privacy for a princess, but some must be)