-
Misc
-
cases
- defence of no common field of business - ok
---
(stop the use of names from a TV series to sell merch (jeans and restaurant services) - C's business was only with TV - D is not in competition with C - DALLAS - SOUTH FORK)
- recognised practise of celebrity endorsement
---
(C was in business of granting licences to use his image - like approved)
-
Copyright
-
character
-
drawing
-
limitation
- if exploitation by an industrial process
- protection reduced to 25 y
- NOT infringement of any (C) in a design document or model recording a design for anything other than an AW to make an article to the design
- m.b. included 2D copy of a 3D article made to a design - arguably! - sought summary judgement
---
(Telly Tubbies - applied on T-shirts - 2D, not 3D)
- difficult case!
- arguably design was applied to an article, not used to make the article
-
issues
- m.b. 2D - 3D
---
(POPEYE)
- NOT ideas
- BUT! still
- concept of humanoid turtles for T-shirt design
infringement
-
sculpture
-
test
- maker must be concerned with shape and appearance rather than just with achieving a precise functional effect
---
(The cartridge looks like a double-barrelled hypodermic syringe)
- Purpose of a sculpture - visual appeal - enjoyed for that purpose alone, whether or not it might have another purpose as well.
Purpose of the creator - the artist's hand.
Intrinsic quality of being intended to be enjoyed as a visual thing.
Whether the maker intended the object to have a visual appeal for its own sake
-
e.g.
- wooden model prototype for a plastic frisbee
-
a work of artistic craftsmanship
-
test
- author was both a craftsman and an artist
- must possess artistry
- eye appeal
- by intention of the author
- must appeal to the aesthetic, not make a particular expression, appeal as a piece of art
- intended to sustain close scrutiny
- made by artist
- person with creative ability who produces something which has aesthetic appeal
- must be made by a craftsman
- person who makes something in a skilful way and who takes justified pride in his workmanship
-
name
- no (C) in a single word
-
image
- use image from a film to make a poster - infringement
-
TM
-
names
-
m.b. difficult
-
m.b. not distinctive, but descriptive.
Association with a person, not company - part of the product - not the source - no connection with the company - simply commemorates the person in question
- BUT! m.b. ok if signature
- BUT!
- m.b. better chance after
---
(m.b. other functions - e.g. badge of loyalty)
-
may depend on carrier
- better
- books, sound rec, films
- if implies some control or guarantee
- worse
- mere image carriers (posters, etc.)
- seen simply descriptive of subject matter
-
3D TM
-
m.b. difficult
-
shape gives substantial value
- collectibles
-
on promotional goods
- m.b. not sufficient to protect from revocation
---
(WELNESS - drinks given away when bought T-shirt)
-
use on merch m.b. not 'trademark use'
-
e.g. merely decorative
---
(slogan on T-shirt)
-
BUT!
- better chance if TM with reputation
---
(stripes - infringement)
-
Passing off
-
problem with harm
-
other jurisdictions
-
Hong-Kong
- same line of business
---
(2 film producers - character - one-armed swordsman - infringement)
-
Australia
- common field is not necessary
- enough that deprived the right to approve the product for a fee
---
(ballroom dancers - music record with their photo)
-
UK
-
no common field
- e.g.
- no common field
- different businesses
---
(children TV programme and waste removal - no common field - no infringement)
- (TV programme - sweet manufacturer (he had goodwill!)
- even real names
- common field
- enough if gives licences for toys, not produce himself.
Also "lousy imitations"
- same as MUPPET
concept of humanoid turtles for T-shirt design
infringement
---
(misrep that goods are genuine - misrep that goods were licensed - because well-known)
- must show
- people would think that the goods were licensed and
- bought them on this basis
- BUT!
- not extended to personality merchandizing
- alternative
- failed
- damage in others not asking licences - held no evidence
---
(JUDGE DREDD)
- succeeded
- Endorsement - tells the relevant public that he approves or is happy to be associated with it
recognised practise of celebrity endorsement
---
(C was in business of granting licences to use his image - people would think that endorsed)
- BUT!
- even if involved in licensing business, no infringement if simply hint at 'official' approval or sponsorship - if no origin confusion - public must have mistaken belief that C actually endorsed the product
- Clark already published some of his memoirs - had reputation as an author - worthy of protection
-
Breach of confidence and privacy
-
no general right to privacy
-
BUT!
-
m.b. under HRA
- BUT!
- not if public ofice
- misuse of personal information
- requirements
- reasonable expectation of privacy - objectively
- public places
- unlikely
- BUT! m.b. if surreptitiously
- private premises
- likely
- defences
- defence
- set the record straight
- NO defence
- not merely reveal conduct which some would find distasteful
- m.b. if argue commercial breach of confidence
-
injunction
- more likely for photographs, because invade privacy each time the photo is published