1. WHERE IS THE INURED PARTY? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_delicti
2. R.C.P. 2 There is one form of action—the civil action. http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_2
3. CAUSATION
4. YOU EITHER HAVE A CASE OR YOU DON'T. FACTS + LAW
   1. STATEMENT OF FACTS
   2. AFFIDAVITS; SWORN STATEMENTS
5. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
   1. SEE FPMLAA CHAPTER 8
      1. http://federalpracticemanual.org/node/46
   2. SEE FPMLAA CHAPTER 9
      1. http://federalpracticemanual.org/node/50
6. SEE FPMLAA CHAPTER 3
   1. http://federalpracticemanual.org/node/18
7. UNLESS, OF COURSE YOU HAVE NO OBJECTIONS
8. A.J.
   1. ...NOW WRAP YOUR MIND AROUND THAT...
      1. This mind map was created 04.08.2013 by Lisa Stinocher O'Hanlon using XMind software. http://www.xmind.net/share/hennalady/ http://angryjeweler.wix.com/write
9. The law of standing has its roots in Article III’s case and controversy requirement. Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488, 492-93 (2009); Daimler Chrysler Corporation v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 340-41 (2006).
   1. The U.S. Supreme Court has established a three-part test for standing: The “irreducible constitutional minimum of standing” requires the plaintiff to establish:.
      1. First ... an “injury in fact”—an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) “actual or imminent,” not “conjectural” or “hypothetical.” Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of—the injury has to be “fairly ... trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not ... th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court.” Third, it must be “likely,” as opposed to merely “speculative,” that the injury will be “redressed by a favorable decision.” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992); see also Summers, 555 U.S. at 493.
         1. Standing must exist on the date the complaint is filed and throughout the litigation. Davis v. Federal Election Commission, 554 U.S. 724, 734 (2008).
         2. Standing cannot be conferred by agreement and can be challenged at any time in the litigation, including on appeal, by the defendants or, in some circumstances, by the court sua sponte. Courts of appeal are obliged to examine standing under all circumstances. See, e.g., Wyoming Outdoor Council v. U.S. Forest Service, 165 F.3d 43, 47 (D.C. Cir. 1999).
         3. Plaintiffs must demonstrate standing for each claim and each request for relief. Davis, 554 U.S. at 7 34; City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 105 (1983).
         4. There is no “supplemental” standing: standing to assert one claim does not create standing to assert claims arising from the same nucleus of operative facts. Daimler Chrysler, 547 U.S. at 353.