-
Open as many doors as possible
- You can only be shown the door
- No one can walk through it for you
- More open doors more likely to pick one
- (although the risk of overwhelming is present)
-
Promote questions and not answers
- Most career models seeks to give answers
- A much more effective position is to give questions
- This gives self direction, while not giving no direction
- (there are those who might not move without specific direction)
-
Not obsessed with definitions
- Defining stuff can be useful
- Until it begins to close minds
- Common definitions decided together are REALLY useful
- (people can get mad when you don't define things)
-
Represent the core of a tester
- Where do skills grow from?
- I believe they grow from a core set of skills
- A core gives rise to interest in deeper learning
- (an expanding core may indicate generalism)
-
Was your career linear?
- Most career models show linear progression
- From role to role, increasing seniority
- But life rarely works like that, much more winding
- (although job titles are still important to some, as I found out)
-
More you learn, the less you know
- As you learn, you realise how little you know
- Hence, as a model, the outer reaches should grow exponentially
- Within each segment, the entry point is smaller than the outer reach
- (To be clear each segment could be a lifetime of learning)
-
Disciplines overlap more than they differ
- Should career models advocate a massive gap between roles
- Or can they look for ways roles overlap instead?
- Advocacy is a skill for all, after all
- (showing commonality might mean role migration)
-
For the buccaneers
- I learn sporadically and widely
- (I have read Secrets of a Buccaneer Scholar)
- Never seen a career model which caters for that style
- Wide shallow learning can open the door for depth