-
I) Lang Dev - A process
-
1.1 A complex, biologically
constrained process
-
through which humans
acquire a symbolic
system (language)
- to communicate
- regulate thought
-
shaped by
- innate predispositions
- environmental input
-
1.2 influenced by both
- 1 innate biological predispositions
- 2 environmental factors
-
1.3 stages from
-
prelinguistic
- to advanced linguistic competence
-
1.4 Questions?
: Studying
Language acquisition-
- 1. What do children have
to know to be able to use language?
- 2 how do children acquire this knowledge?
-
II) Nature of Language
-
2.1 Purpose and Use
-
Humans
-
as social beings
- needing communication
-
language
-
Flexible symbolic system:
- words ==>
represent objects,
actions, feelings
-
Universal across cultures,
- though specific languages vary.
-
communicating
-
External
- Sharing information
with others.
-
Internal
- "Inner voice"
- for self-regulation
- Action/ Thoughts
- (e.g., talking through tasks).
-
2.2 Biological and Evolutionary Roots
-
Unique human trait:
-
Beyond survival signals
- (e.g., monkey predator warnings).
-
New evidence: Apes chat socially
- (BBC, *The Life
of Mammals*).
-
Primates’ communication
- complexity tied to genetic similarity to humans.
-
Bonobo chimps:
- Advanced abilities
(Rumbaugh & Savage-Rumbaugh, 1994).
-
Language tied to consciousness:
-
Reflective (on their actions) species
- have linguistic skills.
-
III) Essential Knowledge for Language
-
3.1 Phonetic Understanding
-
Recognition of phonemes
- (basic sound units).
- English: 45 phonemes; other languages up to 60.
-
3.2 Semantic Awareness
-
1 how these phonemes are combined to form words
-
Phonemes form morphemes
- (meaningful word units).
-
2 what these words mean
- Understanding word meanings and their combinations.
-
3.3 Morphemes
-
the smallest grammatical unit of speech
- meaningful Unit
-
Eg: "Worker" contains two morphemes:
- "work" and "-er".
-
3.4 Syntactic Knowledge
-
Rules for sentence structure
- (e.g., grammar).
- Example: Word order in English vs. other languages.
-
3.5 Pragmatic Understanding
-
Contextual language use
- (e.g., tone for kids vs. adults).
- Examples: Polite requests vs. confessions; varies by audience (tutor, friends).
-
IV) Challenges in Studying
Lang Dev
-
4.1 Methodological Difficulties
-
Reliance on
language-based methods
- limits preverbal study.
-
Comprehension may
precede production
- (e.g., infants understand
but can’t speak).
- Risk of assuming no understanding
if no speech.
-
4.2 Research Tools
-
Habituation techniques:
- Test preverbal understanding
- Example:
Infants distinguish words;
open to interpretive bias.
-
Parental diaries:
- Supplement data
but prone to bias
- (e.g., exaggeration).
-
Snapshots vs.
continuous observation:
- Limits full picture.
-
V) Developmental Stages
-
5.1 Prelinguistic Period
0-12 months
-
Innate Tendencies
- Newborns prefer
language sounds (Butterfield & Siperstein, 1974).
-
Preferential sucking:
- Suck harder to hear speech.
- Tune to native language
in days (Mehler et al., 1986).
-
Vocal Progression
-
Crying:
- Innate reflex,
- then fake cries for attention
(Wolf, 1969).
-
Cooing (1-2 months):
- Vowel repetition.
-
Babbling (3-4 months):
- Adds consonants (e.g., "lalalala").
-
Phonemic contraction (9 months):
- Limits to native phonemes
(Mehler & Dupoux, 1994).
-
Biological Limits
-
Large tongue,
limited dexterity
- restrict sound production.
- Improves by 3 months
with vocal tract changes
(Oates & Grayson, 2004).
-
Semantics
- First word comprehension ~7 months
(e.g., names; Harris et al., 1995).
-
Abilities at 8-18 Months
-
a) Comprehesion
- comprehension spurt
-
b) Production
- physical limitations
-
Ability to identify
individual words
- then - to link words with
their referents
- some understanding of
the grammatical rules
-
pragmatics
-
tend to vocalise
- when another person is speaking.
- then appears - turn-taking
-
gesture
- to direct people’s attention
to objects or events
-
pointing is often
associated with
- object labelling.
-
5.2 Holophrastic Stage
(~10-12 months
- “whole phrase”
-
Single words convey
full meanings
- (e.g., "teddy" = "I want teddy").
-
Nouns dominate,
some social words
- (e.g., "bye-bye").
-
Gestures clarify intent
- (e.g., pointing + "biscuit").
-
Vocabulary: ~3-4 words
at 8 months
- ~60 by 18 months
(Fenson et al., 1994).
-
Comprehension spurt:
- ~40 words at 8 months,
~200 by 18 months.
-
Errors:
-
Underextension
- (e.g., "dog" = family pet only)
-
overextension
- (e.g., "daddy" = all men).
-
syntactic bootstrapping
- an implicit understanding
of the grammar
-
semantic bootstrapping (Pinker)
-
apply their understanding
of words to
- sentences.
-
5.3 Telegraphic Stage
(16-20 months
-
Short phrases omit non-essentials
- (e.g., "all-gone juice").
- constrained by
working-memory limitations
-
Focus on syntax:
- Correct word order
-
(e.g., "daddy gone").
- structurally correct
-
Context/gestures
clarify meaning
-
(e.g., "mummy sock").
- "mummy I want the sock"
- Transition to longer phrases ~2 years.
-
5.4 Refinement
(5+ years
- Complex sentences
with verb endings, plurals.
-
Pragmatics:
-
Tailor speech to listener
- (e.g., baby talk to siblings).
-
Metalinguistic awareness:
- Reflect on language
(Karmiloff-Smith, 1992).
- Examples: Jokes, puns,
reformulating speech (~6 years).
-
Language
-
becomes non-literal
- “people in glass houses
shouldn’t throw stones”
-
Is Lang Dev
predetermined?
-
1. Nature
- genetically programmed
- a biological preparedness
-
2. Nurture
- experience
- environmental input
is necessary
-
VI) Environmental Influences
-
6.1 Baby Talk (Motherese/Parentese
-
Features:
- High pitch, repetition,
exaggerated intonation
(Jacobsen et al., 1983).
-
Purpose:
- Simplify language
(Newport et al., 1997).
-
Limits:
- Not imitated by infants;
- no proven benefit;
- not universal.
-
Debate:
-
Media concerns
- (e.g., "Teletubbies" harm).
- characters adopt an
exaggerated form of
“baby-talk”
- harming ?
- children’s language
development
-
6.2 Deprivation Effects
-
Sensitive period:
- ~7 years critical for acquisition.
-
Case Studies:
-
Isabelle
- (age 6, recovered by 7; Davis, 1947).
-
Genie
- (age 13, stuck at 2-year-old level;
Fromkin et al., 1974).
-
Chelsea
- (age 31, deaf, limited to
2-year-old skills;
Curtiss, 1979).
-
Brain plasticity:
- Early input shapes
language areas (Bates, 1994).
-
6.3 Special Populations
-
Deaf Children
- Sign language mirrors
spoken stages
(Newport & Meier, 1985).
- Hearing parents’ kids
invent gestures
(Goldin-Meadow &
Mylander, 1984).
-
Blind Children
- Normal milestones
sans visual cues
(Landau & Gleitman, 1985).
-
Second Language
-
Easier before 7,
- harder after 7
(Johnson & Newport, 1989).
-
VII) Theories of Language Acquisition
-
7.1 Nativist (Chomsky, 1965, 1981
-
Language Acquisition Device
(LAD):
- Innate brain structure.
- grammatical rules of
all languages.
- child’s biology is
in charge of language
acquisition
-
grammatical features
-
I) Universal principles
- (common grammar)
-
II) parameters
- (language-specific)
- not universal
-
Innate Knowledge
- about the structure
of language
-
a set of cognitive and
perceptual abilities
- specialised for
language learning
-
Passive process:
-
Exposure triggers parameter setting.
- Children Match and
Apply the Rules
-
Evidence:
- Loss of non-native grammar
recognition (Jusczyk et al., 1988).
-
7.2 Behaviourist
-
Learned via
- a) imitation
- b) reinforcement
-
Social shaping:
- "dadadada" → "dada" with feedback.
-
Limits:
-
Can’t explain syntax
without overt teaching
- (Brown & Hanlon, 1970).
-
Not simply imitating
- often produce
grammatically incorrect
phrases and sentences
- Why?
-
7.3 Connectionist
-
Neural networks learn
from feedback,
- no innate rules.
- no domain-specific
learning processes
-
learned as a result of
- interaction
with the social environment
-
Computer models:
- Past-tense learning
(Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986).
-
Human Brain
- operates
- as a computer
-
Stages: Error-free →
rule overgeneralization
- (e.g., "goed") → exceptions.
-
Critique:
- Simplified input,
unlike human complexity.
-
7.4 Representational
Redescription
(Karmiloff-Smith, 1996)
- Domain-specific biases +
domain-general learning.
-
Three phases:
- 1: Data-driven, implicit mastery.
- 2: Rule-based, internal focus, errors.
- 3: Balance internal/external,
refined rules.
- Example: Overapplying
grammar rules,
then adjusting.
-
VIII) Neurological Evidence
-
8.1 Brain Localization
- Left hemisphere dominant
for language (Neville et al., 1998).
-
Early receptivity:
- Left temporal lobe (Bates, 1994).
-
a separate module
- linguistic information
is processed
-
8.2 Plasticity
-
Early damage recovery:
- specific problems
with language
- Other areas adapt
(Reilly et al., 1998).
-
No fixed module:
-
Experience shapes
- language areas
(Maratsos & Matheny, 1994).
-
Late learning harder:
- Neural pathways
less flexible post-7.
-
If Children
-
significant delays
- in language acquisition
-
other cortical areas
- can take over these roles
- plasticity of Brain
- Contrary to Chomsky's
innate Lang Module
- as a result of
- development
- experience
-
IX) Key Learning Processes
-
9.1 Semantic Bootstrapping
(Pinker, 1984
- Syntax aids abstract
word learning (e.g., "think").
- Builds on innate
grammar knowledge.
-
9.2 Syntactic Bootstrapping
(Gleitman, 1990
- Grammar clues word meanings
from sentence structure.
- Example: "Big Bird turning Cookie Monster" (Hirsch-Pasek et al., 1988).
-
9.3 Hypothesis Testing
-
Word meaning stages:
- Underextension → appropriate → overextension → correct
(Clark & Clark, 1977).
-
Innate aids:
- Words = objects,
not properties (Markman, 1992).
-
9.4 Social Feedback
- Adults label objects,
correct errors (e.g., pointing; Baldwin, 1993).
- Expansion of incorrect
grammar (Bohannon et al., 1990).
-
Reflections
-
NO complete explanation
- for language acquisition
-
behaviourist position
-
meaning of words
-
learned
- in the same way of
learning other things
- reinforcement of
associations between
- words
- referents
-
Not account for
-
relative ease
- work out the rules of
- syntax
- pragmatics
- not explicitly taught
- Then? role for innate
predispositions and knowledge
- Explain?
- explain the speed of acquisition
-
The Roles of
- domain-general learning mechanisms
- domain-specific mechanisms
-
Piaget
-
Language Development
- Lang Dev - Byproduct of
- more general
cognitive developments
- restricted by
- reflects
- a child’s cognitive abilities
-
Think?
- children with
language problems are)
- not necessary
cognitively impaired
- (or vice versa
- NOT occur independently
- both cognition and
Language involve
- the formation of
mental representations
- Nature or Nurture.
-
Representational
redescription model
-
Innate - Provides
- starting
point.
-
domain-specific,
domain-general learning
mechanisms
- for Lang Dev
-
learning
-
three distinct phases
- 1) learning is data driven
- results from interaction with
the external environment.
- 2) connections between representations
- generation of rules and principles
- Internal
- over-rule
- environment
- 3) equilibrium
- between external
and internal inputs
-
Children acquire language
- at a rapid rate
-
Neurological evidence
-
left hemisphere
- predisposed to attend
to language
- domain-specific abilities
-
connectionist models
- a lot more input
-
Role of domain general processes
- Then speed
of Lang Acquisition?
- domain-specific
constraints
- on development exist.