-
Introduction
-
Hp
- WHO-designated carcinogen
- 89% of all gastric cancer are attributable to Hp
-
Consequences of failed treatment
- Clinical complications related to Hp infection
- Repeated exposure to antibiotics and high dose acid supression
- Generation of antibiotic resistance
- Direct and indirect costs to the healthcare system
-
Guidelines of treatment
- Limited high-quality evidence
-
Definition
-
Refractory Hp infection
-
Persistently positive non-serological Hp test
- At least 4 weeks following one or more completed course
-
Causes of Hp eradication treatment failure
-
Antibiotic resistance
-
More likely if there is in vitro resistance
-
For example:
- Clarithromycin
- 7.0-fold higher likelihood of treament failure
- Levofloxacin
- 8.2-fold higher likelihood of treament failure
- Nitroimidazole
- 2.5-fold higher likelihood of treament failure
-
Overall primary resistance rates
- 10-34% for clarithromycin
- 11-30% for levofloxacin
- 23-56% for metronidazole
-
Secondary resistance rates
- 15-67% for clarithromycin
- 19-30% for levofloxacin
- 30-65% for metronidazole
-
Selecting eradication therapies based on prior antibiotic exposure
-
Not inferior to
- Selecting therapy based on in vitro antibiotic susceptibility
-
Dominant molecular mechanisms
-
Clarithromycin
- Mutations in the 23S ribosomal subunit
-
Levofloxacin
- Mutations in DNA gyrase subunit A
-
Amoxicillin
- Mutations in penicillin binding protein 1
-
Tetracycline
- Mutations in genes encoding binding site for ribosomal 16S subunit
-
Rifabutin
- Mutations in rpoB, the beta subunit of RNA polymerase gene
-
Nitroimidazole
- Complex rdxA mutations
- This may contribute to
- Low predictive value of in vitro metronidazole resistance testing to treatment outcome
- Resistance rates were lower for amoxicillin, tetracycline and rifabutin (<5%)
-
Patient nonadherence
-
Adherence to >60% to >90% of the prescribed course
-
Might be sufficient for successful eradication
- At least in primary H. pylori infection
-
Common barriers
- Complexity of eradication regimens
- High pill burden
- Physical intolerance of medications
- Poor provider communication
- Lack of understanding of why therapy is indicated
-
Physicians should provide anticipatory guidance
- Explaining the rationale for therapy
- Dosing instructions
- Expected adverse events
- Importance of completing the full therapeutic course
-
Host genetics
-
Polymorphisms that affect intragastric pH
-
CYP2C19, IL-1B and MDR1
- Hp is most susceptible to antibiotics when intragastric pH is consistently between 6-8
- Since this is the optimal pH range for Hp replication
- Some antibiotics (clarithromycin and amoxicillin) also require intragastric acid suppression
- For maximum efficacy and sustained activity
- CYP2C19 polymorphisms
- Metabolism-enhancing phenotypes are associated with higher rates of eradication failure
- More in case of PPIs that are heavily metabolized by CYP2C19 (e.g. omeprazole, lansoprazole)
- More prevalent in non-asian groups
-
Physicians should
- Give higher doses and/or increased frequency of first-generation PPIs
- Use of later generation, more potent PPIs
- Select potent non-PPI gastric acid suppressors, such as vonoprazan
-
Other factors
- Age
-
Smoking
-
Smoking increases gastric acid secretion and impairs mucous secretion and gastric blood flow
- Decreasing local antibiotic delivery
-
Strategies to advance the field and potential adjunctive therapies
- Incorporate regional information of local success rates
- Non-invasive H. pylori antibiotic sensitivity testing on stool
- Addition of clavulanic acid to amoxicillin-based regimens
- Statins
-
Probiotics
-
Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium
- Inhibitory effect as well as enhanced patient tolerance to the treatment
-
Antibiotic Susceptibility-based Approach
- Sensitivity testing should be considered after two failed attempts at treatment
- Lack of convincing data demonstrating superiority compared to empirically selecting treatment based on prior antibiotic exposure
-
Culture-based methods
-
Success rates of obtaining a useful result
- <80-95%
-
Molecular resistance testing
- Can also be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy tissue
-
Considerations in regimen selection for refractory Hp
-
Macrolides and fluoroquinolones
- Should not be repeated in subsequent treatment attempts
- It is important to consider antibiotic history of usage of macrolides and fluroquinolones
-
Amoxicillin, tetracycline, and rifabutin
- Have very low primary and secondary resistance
-
Resistance to nitroimidazoles
- Should not be considered as an ‘absolute’ contraindication
-
Might be potentially overcome with dose adjustments and addition of bismuth
- Metronidazole, at least in the 1.5-2 g/day range
-
Achieve adequate threshold levels of amoxicillin and intragastric acid suppression
- 2-3g amoxicillin into at least three doses daily
- Higher doses, greater frequency (e.g. TID or QID PPI dosing), and the use of more potent PPIs (e.g. esomeprazole or rabeprazole)
-
Vonoprazan
- First-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker
- Longer treatment durations
-
Proposed treatment algorithm
-
Only FDA-approved for refractory Hp infection
- PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline (PBMT)
-
If PBMT fails as a first-line treatment
- Levofloxacin- or rifabutin-based triple therapy regimens with high-dose dual proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin
- An alternative bismuth-containing quadruple therapy
-
If levofloxacin resistance rates >15%
- Should not be considered