Preliminary
Duties
Loyalty
Good faith
Must avoid any potential conflict of interest
Depend on relationship
Relationships
Fiduciary per se
Arises when
X has a duty to act in Y's interest
X has duties and powers which could be used in his own interest
Arises on the facts
Y is relying on X's loyalty
and is especially vulnerable
Makes equitable remedies available
Fills gaps in common law
Approach of courts
Very strict
Particularly in case of a trust
Prophylactic approach
Evidential problems
Remedies
Personal remedy
Compensation for loss
Account for unauthorised profit
Proprietary remedy
Claim property representing profit
Remuneration
General rule
Trustees cannot charge for services
Exceptions
Authorised by trust instrument
'Charging clause'
Beneficiaries' consent
All must be sui juris
Fair
Full disclosure
Court order
Inherent jurisdiction to authorise remuneration
If in interest of beneficiaries
Re Duke of Norfolk's ST [1981]
Trustee Act 2000
s28
professional capacity
in course of business
which includes administration of trusts
s29
if not a trust corporation
other trustees must agree in writing
so cannot apply to sole trustee
does not apply if charging covered by trust instrument
'reasonable' remuneration
Public Trustee publishes rates
Basis of fiduciary duties
Conaglen
Fiduciary duty is an obligation not to allow personal interest to conflict with non-fiduciary duties to the trust
Consistent with strict application
Keech v Sandford
Consistent with prophylactic approach
Companies Act 2006
Codifies fiduciary duties of directors
s175
Must avoid any situation with potential for conflict of interest
Particularly applies to
property
information
opportunity
Except with consent of other directors
(only applies to companies formed after 1 Oct 2008)
Or if cannot reasonable be regarded as giving rise to conflict
Does not apply if conflict arises in relation to transaction with the company itself
must just declare interest
s176
Must not accept benefits from third parties conferred by reason of directorship
unless could not reasonably be regarded as conflict
Remedies
Personal
Must account for unauthorised profit
Proprietary
Hold actual property on constructive trust
Lister v Stubbs (1890)
Stubbs purchased land with secret commission
Court did not accept was held on constructive trust
Had not taken trust property
Only personal claim permitted
A-G for Hong Kong v Reid [1994]
Government official accepted bribes
Used bribes to buy property
Held that property held on constructive trust
Has been criticised
Should not impose constructive trust lightly
Gives priority over creditors if bankrupt
Law can strip fiduciary of profit even in personal claim
Incidental profits
Must account for any personal profit gained
From use of trust property
Or opportunity gained through position
Or information gained through position
Indirect remuneration from third party
Director's fees
Was appointment dependent on trust shares?
If so, must account
Re Macadam[1946]
If not, may keep fees
Re Gee [1948]
Unless authorised by trust instrument
Or court order
Will use sparingly
Re Keeler's ST [1981]
only if special care and skill required
If Director before became trustee
May keep fees
Re Dover Coalfield Extension [1908]
Commission
Has to account
Williams v Barton [1927]
Unless authorised by trust instrument
Renewal of trust leases and purchase of freehold conversion
Renewal
If obtain renewal for own benefit
Must surrender to trust
Held on constructive trust for beneficiary
Even if landlord refused to renew for benefit of trust
Keech v Sandford (1726)
Purchase of freehold
same applies
Protheroe v Protheroe [1968]
will be reimbursed
Use of trust opportunities and information
Boardman v Phipps [1967]
Trust owned shares in private company
Son and solicitor bought further shares
Trust could not have bought
Beneficiaries gave permission but did not have full information
Needed permission of trustees too
Said they represented trust in negotiations
Acted as proxies of trustees
This gave rise to fiduciary rel
Gained control of company
Company became profitable
Held liable
Majority upheld strict rule in
Keech v Sandford (1726)
Had to account for shares and profit
Reimbursed with costs
Awarded generous remuneration under court's inherent jurisdiction
Purchase of trust property
Purchase of trust property
Sale is voidable by beneficiaries
Can demand property back
Trustee reimbursed for purchase price
If sold to bona fide purchaser, can demand profit on sale
Applies
to personal representatives as well as trustees
regardless of whether advantage gained
Ex parte Lacey (1802)
even where independently valued
Wright v Morgan [1926]
or at auction
Exceptions
All beneficiaries sui juris and consent
Authorised by trust instrument
Obtains court's consent
Holder v Holder
thought had renounced role as executor
had not acted as both vendor and purchaser
made intention to purchase clear throughout
Purchase of beneficiary's equitable interest
Beneficiaries can avoid
Unless trustee shows is fair and no undue influence
Must disclose all material facts before purchase
Transaction is fair and honest
Must show took no advantage
Competition with the trust
Trustee is accountable for profits of any competing business
Injunction to prevent trustee carrying on competing business
Re Thompson [1930]
Restrained from setting up yacht broking business in same town