-
We don't do things right the first time
- Lack of Knowledge
- Unclear Priorities / Objectives & Mandate
-
Lack of resource (time, Budget, availability)
- Available pool of skilled labor is limited
- Difficult to substantiate request for budget
- Many activities
- Lack of Harmonization between departments
- Resistance to formal Processes
- Incomplete Upfront Project/Domain Vision Definition
-
Requirement Management
-
Lack of resource (time, Budget, availability)
-
Available pool of skilled labor is limited
- Many other OEMs working on new programs
- Lack of coaching or mentoring
-
Difficult to substantiate request for budget
- Lack of knowledge to quantify business needs ($$)
-
Lack of time to do the background work
- poor planning
-
Lack of experience
- Projects are unique
- Introducing new things
- Project documentation & schedules are not kept so that it can be reused
-
Many activities
-
Poor Planning
- Accept everything
- Don't know how to plan
- Constantly Underestimating level of effort
-
Many unplanned activities
- Processes are not followed
- Bad processes
- Lack of subject matter knowledge
- A lot of adhoc activities
- Activities have not been formalized
-
Previous
-
Lack of Knowledge Management
-
Can't find what was done on previous programs
- Don't leverage existing knowledge & BA. People keep re-inventing the wheel
- lack of Simulation & test data management on CSeries
- Lost data & insufficient data reuse from program to program
- Jumping to solutions without proper analysis (ex AE, assigning objectives to push AES)
-
Management Issues
-
Management does not always make decisions at proper time
- Sometimes upper management isn't aware of decisions made at lower levels
- Bad financing. No core budgets
- lack of support from top for AES
- Not enough long term strategic planning
-
Lack of Harmonization between departments
-
Lack of harmonization of expectations between departments on same program
- lack of harmonization between departments in general
- Insufficient business planning/collaboration between technical & stress groups
- lack of collaboration (open to accept feedback)
- BA's internal objectives overshadowed by ITs objectives
-
Weak Planning
-
Activities on program are not properly planned
- BA program schedule does not include all RM activities
- Lack of planning for IT budgets & support
-
Poor Quality of Deliverable
-
Multiple revision of documents
- Writing first time quality requirements
- Writing vague requirements
- Low RM deliverable quality
- ARP4754 RM plan insufficient for ARP4754 (incomplete, low quality)
- Configuration Management / Change management plan on CSeries delivered late and not approved. Not deployed. Unachievable plan
-
Resistance to formal Processes
-
Not all departments have defined processes documented
- People do not follow defined processes
- Designing workarounds to processes
- How BA implements ARP process
- People who start new programs are not always aware of what needs to be done
- Insufficient/nonstandardized methods development
-
Lack of Systems Engineering approach
-
Weak system decomposition
- Data & process auditing weak
- Data & process alignment weak across BA
- No use cases
- Lack of System modeling
- No validation up front for requirements
- Forgot break pedal on the CSeries
-
Lack of Team spirit
-
Little or no team building activities
- People are reluctant to go against the current due to company politics. Scared to stand up for change
- PMPs & PDPs happening late in the year
-
Poor Project Management Execution
-
Missed milestones schedule
- Missed dates on project plans
-
Lack of expertise
- The supplier does everything. BA does not need as much expertise
-
PDM
-
Symptoms
- Need to re-scope/descope the project
- Need to stop the project development and return to the design board
- Need to stop the project development and return to the BU requirements
- Working in the wrong direction
- acting before planning / planning before checking or grasping situation
- Recreating material instead of reuse (eRoom)
- Difficult to find and access information (eRoom)
- Difficult to find and access latest information (eRoom)
- BM takes weeks to written because information not available
- training material need to be reworked because the material is not ready on time or has a poor quality
- repeat meetings because of key members lack of time/participation
- Solution doesn't meet business requirements
- Incomplete document
- Business not informed of the as-is processes
- Requirements in the IT document not clear for the business
- Business do not recognize their needs in document
- Business do not understand document
- Business not happy of the delivery dates and delays
- Business not happy with the solution
- Project exceed budget
- Business not happy to see only Power Point presentation of the solution
- Business complaint about lack of planning & communication
- Business complaint about scope creep
-
Scope not clearely defined
- Scope not well identified
- Unclear Project Scope
- Scope changes during the project
-
Lack of resource (time, expertise, headcount)
- Lack of PLMP and business participation
- Scope and delivery dates not realistic with budget and resource
- Lack of time & budget for training
- Lack of planning (maily for mid & long term plannning)
- Lack of time & budget from key resources
- Lack of expertise
-
Divergent Priorities
- Business informed at the last minute for participation
- Unclear R&R
- Lack of clear communication
- Lack of business involvement to define process & requirements
- IT priority is to deliver solution
- Requirement & Process documentation is a low priority for the business
- IT not capable to use business terminology in their document
- Lack of synnergy between IT & PLMP
-
PPD & CAE
-
No standard process framework
-
Poorly defined deliverables
- no clear R&Rs
- Little or no standard work
-
Incomplete Upfront Project/Domain Vision Definition
-
time constraints
-
too many projects
- too many programs
- lack of portfolio prioritisation
- unclear prioritisation methodology
- unclear value management processes
-
lack PLM process skills and experience
- availability of resources on market
-
project leader is incapable of synthesizing a vision
- lack of formal training / coaching
- wrong personality type
-
junior resources fulfilling senior roles
- availability of resources on market
-
immature PLM solution capabilities
- technology readiness level for aerospace
- continuously evolving business environment
-
unclear mandate/scope
-
time constraints
- too many projects
- insufficient resources
-
too many projects
- lack of portfolio prioritisation
- unclear prioritisation methodology
- unclear value management processes
- too many programs
- inconsistent breakdown of domains
-
problem complexity
- poor roles & responsibilities
-
alignment across BA teams (IT, PLMP, PLM CC, APD, et al
- poor communication
-
nature of responsibilities
-
responsibility is abstract with unclear deliverables
- unclear mandate/scope
- activity may require iterative process rather than arriving at best solution immediately
- low empowerment levels to accomplish activities
-
Unclear PLMP Mandate
-
different levels of management perceive mandate differently
- top-down communication
-
Poor project workflow
- no clear phase/gating system
- lack of resource involvement by PMs
-
time constraints
- schedule, resource, budgetary considerations
-
lack of portfolio management
- budget and resources
-
Lack of collaboration from other BA teams
-
Other team's understanding of PLMP's R&R
- poor internal understanding of mandate
-
Collaboration & CS
-
We do not know what needs to be done
-
Unclear Priorities / Objectives
-
There is conflicting priorities/objectives
- Multi-Program Support, Short vs Long term goals, budget allocation (we work only if we have money to spend on that program)
-
Unclear R&Rs
-
New organization which has not clearly defined our value added within the IT/BU environment. Our role as the owner of product development processes is not recognized nor understood.
- Since our organization is in Engineering, the perception is that we only serve Engineering processes not the full PLM processes from conception to in-service.
- We have not properly defined the value we bring to IT projects and to the various BUs
- PLM does not know what being owner of the product development processes means
-
Lack of Knowledge
-
1. Why do we a lack of Knowledge
- We do not exploit the experience of employees hired
- 2. Why do we not exploit the experience of employees?
- Steep Learning Curve of new Employees due to Project Time Constraints
- 3. Why do we have a steep learning curve?
- Employees not having experience with BA processes
- Employees not having BA Culture Experience
- Multitude of subject matters makes it difficult to have full knowledge of every process
-
Symptoms
- Kenexa survey inputs
- Errors in execution of our deliverables/processes – more effort is required to do the work
- Work needs to be redone/repeated
- Many teams working on the same deliverables
- Individual workload surpasses expectations
- Committed delivery dates are rarely met. Planned vs execution.
-
Objectives
- Clarified Roles & Responsibilities between PLM teams, IT and BUs
- Team focused on Priorities and setting priorities according to our strategic direction
- (right size our involvement)
- Clear and agreed upon delivery dates with an understanding of the impacts of not delivering
- Quality deliverables
-
Measure
- Results from next year’s, Kenexa survey
- Survey given to PLM, IT & BUs on R&Rs
- Track start & end dates of deliverables
- Survey on the quality of the PLM deliverables sent to IT, BUs & Management
-
MFG
-
Unclear Priorities/ Objectives & Mandate
-
Symptoms
- Frustration & Stress Levels AES Standups
- Schedule / Quality / Scope / Cost Impact & Changes
- Project Expectations not realized
- Decrease risk/issue Visibility at IPDT's
-
Objectives
- Stress Free Objectives & Scope Realization throughtout project activities
- Common BU Strategy and Resource Forecast
- Increased Departmental influence & budgeted FTE's
-
Measure
- Levels of Communication between PLMP SU's and IT
- AES STandup Stress Levels
- Limited Budget Variance
- Progressive Return on Investment