1. Participants
    1. Melissa
    2. Andy
    3. Sue
    4. Erik
  2. Today's Outcomes
    1. We know what we're doing.
    2. We know who is doing it & when.
    3. We can communicate the above.
    4. The team gets productive work.
  3. Issues
    1. Names of things (TSOM, MTW)
    2. Not enough work, or *perceived* lack of work?
    3. Priorities?
      1. TSOM
        1. Phase I
          1. Basic setup
          2. Wiki pages
          3. Cowboy Geyser
          4. Alfresco Metadata
          5. Bulk Import / Export
          6. Move Geyser from ML --> Alfresco
          7. Wrangle all access into a single DAO layer
          8. DocID Generator
          9. Aspects
          10. Move FDR to it's own instance
          11. Productionize
      2. Legacy (PubMeta)
        1. Code review
        2. Basic enhancement of practices through
      3. Performance / Scale
        1. Some Ixxus responsibility
        2. This is an epic, rather than a project
        3. Does BCS (Big Content Store) handle this?
          1. Ixxus Patent
          2. Alfresco is good for WIP
          3. Need intelligent tools to manage file system, search, graph/triple stores (bcs)
          4. Tom Morris is "da man" for BCS
        4. Doug said "Millions of users"
          1. We don't know if Alfresco can do this.
          2. Assumes that customers will want to share & elaborate content.
      4. Underpinning work
      5. Storage - get all content into Alfresco
        1. Doug is pushing for this
      6. 4LTR
      7. We HAVEN'T yet talked about...
        1. Metadata
        2. Rights
          1. Could be large
          2. Discovery needs to happen soon
        3. Compose
          1. Andrea seemed to think it wasn't that important
          2. Andy thinks it's very similar to Telescope, if not identical
          3. did they not use Telescope because it was hard to use Telescope?
          4. Can we connect SWAN directly to Telescope?
      8. Content Pipeline
        1. Adelaide has this
        2. We need to sync up our efforts
    4. DevOps
      1. We can't have a person at the table.
      2. Carlos is acting as junior SysAdmin.
      3. We owe a list of things we're waiting on CLTS for
        1. A REAL QA environment
        2. We want a person who can make this happen to work with iteratively on building our environments
        3. Remaining environments
  4. Who has what?
    1. Melissa
      1. CCMS
    2. Michael
      1. Geyser
    3. Dina
      1. Roadmap
      2. Everything else
  5. Business Needs
    1. "Get content under control"
      1. What content is there?
        1. "Rich Media" is content that isn't in any system.
        2. Do we know where all the silos are? (No!)
      2. What duplication do we have?
        1. Share / consolidate.
    2. Make content discoverable
  6. Projects
    1. PubMeta
      1. Seems to be in good hands at the moment
    2. Media Store
      1. Waiting on Ixxus - Andy has this
    3. Strategic review of assessment authoring tools
      1. May be another group owning it
      2. Bernard? UX lady in CA who did the personna?
    4. Rights
      1. We haven't started on it yet
      2. The elephant in the room
    5. VAQ
      1. Validate that this is an immediate priority with Dina
      2. Verify it's done, or assign a different lead
    6. Load Higher ed content to CCMS
      1. Depdends on media store discovery
      2. Need to know scale
    7. Instructor Authoring
      1. We have until "spring", which probably means done by mid-Jan
      2. We need to do it right - larger project.
      3. Can we do it in 8 months?
      4. Does it fit into the wider review of authoring tools?
  7. Next Actions
    1. TSOM
      1. Validate assumptions with Walt
        1. MT builder goes through Geyser
        2. We can swap Alfresco for ML
        3. We can keep existing file store (or it's structure)
        4. We need to move FDR to it's own instance of ML
      2. Estimation session with Walt and 1-2 devs
      3. CER status
        1. Do we have blessing to proceed with some dev work?
    2. Determine the fate of FDR
      1. We think it's "keep the lights on"
      2. It's on the high priority list (contradicts the above)
    3. Discuss ownership of FDR
      1. With Dina and Michael
      2. It will go to Dina
    4. Discuss ownership of TSOM (MT workflow)
      1. With Michael
      2. It will go to Melissa
    5. Larger content authoring question
      1. Andrew to follow up with Adelaide/Andrea/Kathi
    6. Determine go-forward plan for Instructor Authoring
      1. Get Sanjay and Mike S in the loop
      2. When is it due, and how big is it?
      3. What are we replacing?
        1. MarkLogic?
        2. Additional data store?
    7. Follow up on VAQ
    8. Remind Mike that we have ORCA as an integration point
      1. Is it going away?
      2. How will that affect us?
    9. Content Architecture Pipeline
      1. Sue and Andrew Touch base with Adelaide/Andrea to understand context